Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Joel Gilbert"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>MichaelQSchmidt
(rsp)
imported>MichaelQSchmidt
(m)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
::*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joel_Gilbert&diff=531570192&oldid=531517139 Modified] setction per example set by [[User:Prioryman]], to better show that the section represents reviewer opinion and not news fact. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 19:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::*[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Joel_Gilbert&diff=531570192&oldid=531517139 Modified] setction per example set by [[User:Prioryman]], to better show that the section represents reviewer opinion and not news fact. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 19:09, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*Sorry for overlooking the fact that this was outstanding. To be honest, I am still uncertain about these sources, especially quoting someone as extreme and marginal as Corsi. I'll ask on [[WT:DYK]] for a second opinion. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 19:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:::*Sorry for overlooking the fact that this was outstanding. To be honest, I am still uncertain about these sources, especially quoting someone as extreme and marginal as Corsi. I'll ask on [[WT:DYK]] for a second opinion. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 19:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
::::*Well... "extreme and marginal" as [[Jerome Corsi|Corsi]] or [[ WorldNetDaily]] ''may'' be thought, Wikipedia [[WP:UNCENSORED|does not judge]] what they say, but under [[WP:RSOPINION]] simply and neutrally reports that it was said.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Jerome+Corsi&fulltext=1][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=+WorldNetDaily&fulltext=1]  Same goes for [[Blogcritics]], as a site themselves quoted by and used by reliable sources and widely used through consensus across Wikipedia,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Blogcritics&fulltext=1] it would seem that disallowing citations to sourcable opinions would result in a large number of deletions across the project. I am not asserting THAT any opinion-maker is correct, but am simply showing  that an opinion was made. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 01:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
+
::::*Well... "extreme and marginal" as [[Jerome Corsi|Corsi]] or [[ WorldNetDaily]] ''may'' be thought, Wikipedia [[WP:UNCENSORED|does not judge]] what they say, but under [[WP:RSOPINION]] simply and neutrally reports that it was said.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Jerome+Corsi&fulltext=1][http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=+WorldNetDaily&fulltext=1]  Same goes for [[Blogcritics]], as a site [[WP:USEBYOTHERS|themselves quoted by and used by reliable sources]] and widely used through consensus across Wikipedia,[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=Blogcritics&fulltext=1] it would seem that disallowing citations to sourcable opinions would result in a large number of deletions across the project. I am not asserting THAT any opinion-maker is correct, but am simply showing  that an opinion was made. '''[[User:MichaelQSchmidt|<font color="blue">Schmidt,</font>]]''' ''[[User talk:MichaelQSchmidt|<sup><small>MICHAEL Q.</small></sup>]]'' 01:40, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:42, 21 January 2013

Joel Gilbert

  • Reviewed: Albert G. Mumma
  • Comment: A December 22 stub sent to AFD the same day as creation, but rescued through some easy-to-perform 5x expansion and sourcing

Created/expanded by MichaelQSchmidt (talk), Bonkers The Clown (talk). Nominated by MichaelQSchmidt (talk) at 05:56, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol question.svg I've had a look through it and made a number of copyedits. It's generally OK, but a few of the sources are very questionable, either being blogs or categorically unreliable sources: specifically #11 (Blogcritics), #13 and #15 (WND) and #16 (Right Wing Watch). I don't think the article can be accepted with these sources being used. Prioryman (talk) 22:50, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
Well said, Michael. Bonkers The Clown (Nonsensical Babble) 05:58, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
  • Sorry for overlooking the fact that this was outstanding. To be honest, I am still uncertain about these sources, especially quoting someone as extreme and marginal as Corsi. I'll ask on WT:DYK for a second opinion. Prioryman (talk) 19:57, 20 January 2013 (UTC)