Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/John H. Pratt"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Innisfree987
(reviewing proposing slightly tweaked hook)
imported>Neutrality
(Works for me)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
:::ALT1: ... that in a 1974 [[bench trial]] connected to the [[Watergate scandal]], Judge '''[[John H. Pratt]]''' found [[G. Gordon Liddy]] guilty of [[contempt of Congress]]?
 
:::ALT1: ... that in a 1974 [[bench trial]] connected to the [[Watergate scandal]], Judge '''[[John H. Pratt]]''' found [[G. Gordon Liddy]] guilty of [[contempt of Congress]]?
 
::I'm just thinking that may help a wider readership understand the significance. It's slightly longer but still well under 200 characters. Beyond that, the entry's new enough, long enough, neutral, clears Earwig's Copyvio, hook is sourced, QPQ done--good to go! [[User:Innisfree987|Innisfree987]] ([[User talk:Innisfree987|talk]]) 16:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 
::I'm just thinking that may help a wider readership understand the significance. It's slightly longer but still well under 200 characters. Beyond that, the entry's new enough, long enough, neutral, clears Earwig's Copyvio, hook is sourced, QPQ done--good to go! [[User:Innisfree987|Innisfree987]] ([[User talk:Innisfree987|talk]]) 16:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 
+
::: Alt1 works for me—thanks! [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]]<sup>[[User talk:Neutrality|talk]]</sup> 04:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 04:15, 31 March 2018

John H. Pratt

5x expanded by Neutrality (talk). Self-nominated at 02:45, 25 March 2018 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Very nice work on the entry! All looks good. What would you think of making the following adjustment to the hook:
ALT1: ... that in a 1974 bench trial connected to the Watergate scandal, Judge John H. Pratt found G. Gordon Liddy guilty of contempt of Congress?
I'm just thinking that may help a wider readership understand the significance. It's slightly longer but still well under 200 characters. Beyond that, the entry's new enough, long enough, neutral, clears Earwig's Copyvio, hook is sourced, QPQ done--good to go! Innisfree987 (talk) 16:35, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Alt1 works for me—thanks! Neutralitytalk 04:14, 31 March 2018 (UTC)