Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/John Lewis Christmas advert"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Edwardx
(good to go)
imported>Yoninah
(Christmas hook?)
Line 30: Line 30:
  
 
:::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you for the reminder [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]]. Everything is fine now. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 09:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 
:::::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thank you for the reminder [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]]. Everything is fine now. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 09:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 
+
::::::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{ping|Edwardx}} can this be moved to the Christmas special occasion section? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 14:21, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:21, 7 December 2014

John Lewis Christmas advert

Created by 03md (talk). Self nominated at 00:45, 7 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough. Long enough. QPQ done. NPOV. Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "Violation Unlikely". Hook is decent enough, but the article refers to it as being the Beatles "last single", which is not necessarily the same thing. Otherwise, every paragraph is cited, including the hook fact. Edwardx (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the review - I've changed "single" to "song" in the article to reflect the hook as I know there can be some ambiguity. 03md 21:54, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Note to Edwardx: Earwig's detector was removed from the DYK list because it was deemed unreliable as a copyvio and close paraphrase check. Please use either Duplication detector or do your own spotcheck of sources. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Sorry about that BlueMoonset. Another reviewer recommended Earwig a while ago - I was unfamiliar with its history vis-a-vis DYK. I've now used dup detactor, and found no significant close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. Edwardx (talk) 10:51, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Edwardx, do you have anything remaining on this review, or need anything to be done? If not, then it needs to be completed with the proper icon. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2014 (UTC)