Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/John Shaa"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Andrew Davidson (review) |
imported>NinaGreen |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | {{*mp}}... that the court of requests instituted by '''[[John Shaa|Sir John Shaa]]''' while he was [[Lord Mayor of London]] proved unpopular because it favoured the poor more than " | + | {{*mp}}... that the court of requests instituted by '''[[John Shaa|Sir John Shaa]]''' while he was [[Lord Mayor of London]] proved unpopular because it favoured the poor more than "Justyce & good lawe Requyrid"? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article looks good in all respects. I have a query about the hook though. The source gives the quote as "Justyce & good lawe Requyrid". If we are quoting then I feel we should be quite accurate. Using the archaic spelling would give the hook a good period feel, which might attract interest, I feel. [[User:Andrew Davidson|Andrew Davidson]] ([[User talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 19:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] The article looks good in all respects. I have a query about the hook though. The source gives the quote as "Justyce & good lawe Requyrid". If we are quoting then I feel we should be quite accurate. Using the archaic spelling would give the hook a good period feel, which might attract interest, I feel. [[User:Andrew Davidson|Andrew Davidson]] ([[User talk:Andrew Davidson|talk]]) 19:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::* Good suggestion. I've made the change. Thanks for the review! [[User:NinaGreen|NinaGreen]] ([[User talk:NinaGreen|talk]]) 19:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:33, 26 June 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
John Shaa
- ... that the court of requests instituted by Sir John Shaa while he was Lord Mayor of London proved unpopular because it favoured the poor more than "Justyce & good lawe Requyrid"?
Created by NinaGreen (talk). Self nominated at 00:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC).
- 16px The article looks good in all respects. I have a query about the hook though. The source gives the quote as "Justyce & good lawe Requyrid". If we are quoting then I feel we should be quite accurate. Using the archaic spelling would give the hook a good period feel, which might attract interest, I feel. Andrew Davidson (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)