Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/John W. Schwada"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sammi Brie
imported>Jakec
(gtg)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
:***Perhaps the reference could point to the newspaper itself in that case (it's okay if it's offline). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 14:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 
:***Perhaps the reference could point to the newspaper itself in that case (it's okay if it's offline). --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 14:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 
:****[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Thanks for that, I've done that and reduced some of the close paraphrasing a bit. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 03:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 
:****[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Thanks for that, I've done that and reduced some of the close paraphrasing a bit. [[User:Raymie|Raymie]] ([[User talk:Raymie|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Raymie|c]]) 03:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
 +
:*****[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] OK. The source is on JSTOR and not all of it can be seen without paying. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 01:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:02, 12 November 2014

John W. Schwada

5x expanded by Raymie (talk). Self nominated at 03:03, 29 October 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Sufficiently expanded, mostly meets core content policies. However, ancestry.com is unreliable and there are some bare URLs. There's also some slight close paraphrasing perhaps; check the earwig tool. --Jakob (talk) 18:37, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
    • The Ancestry item is actually a copy and paste of his obituary which came from a Missouri newspaper. I haven't had time to check close paraphrasing (this week turned unusually busy), but that will probably happen soon. Raymie (tc) 14:57, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Perhaps the reference could point to the newspaper itself in that case (it's okay if it's offline). --Jakob (talk) 14:00, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
        • 16px Thanks for that, I've done that and reduced some of the close paraphrasing a bit. Raymie (tc) 03:20, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
          • 16px OK. The source is on JSTOR and not all of it can be seen without paying. --Jakob (talk) 01:02, 12 November 2014 (UTC)