Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Juan Rosario Mazzone"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(new reviewer needed)
imported>Aymatth2
(no way)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  New reviewer needed as a second opinion has been requested, and new ALT hook supplied (striking original hook). In addition, the original review did not cover neutrality, which could be an issue given a political scandal, and close paraphrasing, and the new review needs to cover both. I skimmed the article briefly, and it needs to be copyedited. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  New reviewer needed as a second opinion has been requested, and new ALT hook supplied (striking original hook). In addition, the original review did not cover neutrality, which could be an issue given a political scandal, and close paraphrasing, and the new review needs to cover both. I skimmed the article briefly, and it needs to be copyedited. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 15:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
  
 +
[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] The article reports some sensational allegations made last month by two newspapers about a minor local politician that may or may not result in a trial. This is not neutral "encyclopedic" material by any standard. [[User:Aymatth2|Aymatth2]] ([[User talk:Aymatth2|talk]]) 01:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:17, 24 March 2015

Juan Rosario Mazzone

Created by Cambalachero (talk). Self nominated at 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC).

  • DYK check shows that it is more than 1500 characters long (2603 characters). It was created as a redirect in January, and created as an article on Feb 9, and finished on Feb 11. QPQ has been done. Hook is sourced but I don't think it is particularly interesting? It does even mention why he was removed from office. I'm not sure if this is interesting enough for DYK. It's a very short article and clearly didn't exist until one month ago, meaning that hardly any people would know who this is anyway. That's my only concern with it. I'd like a second opinion, maybe it's just my personal view. Symbol question.svg  — ₳aron 12:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg New reviewer needed as a second opinion has been requested, and new ALT hook supplied (striking original hook). In addition, the original review did not cover neutrality, which could be an issue given a political scandal, and close paraphrasing, and the new review needs to cover both. I skimmed the article briefly, and it needs to be copyedited. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:21, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Symbol delete vote.svg The article reports some sensational allegations made last month by two newspapers about a minor local politician that may or may not result in a trial. This is not neutral "encyclopedic" material by any standard. Aymatth2 (talk) 01:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)