Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/K/DA"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Satellizer (re) |
imported>Zanhe (GTG) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::: I'd personally prefer fewer quotations, but that's not a DYK requirement. For the purpose of DYK, you only need to reword the offending sentences. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 06:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | :::: I'd personally prefer fewer quotations, but that's not a DYK requirement. For the purpose of DYK, you only need to reword the offending sentences. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 06:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::::{{ping|Zanhe}} I've rephrased the sentences with close paraphrasing issues and reduced the article's dependency on quotes - it should be okay now '''''[[User:Satellizer|<font color="#00B7EB">Satellizer el Bridget</font>]] [[User talk:Satellizer|<font color="magenta"><sup>(Talk)</sup></font>]]''''' 11:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | :::::{{ping|Zanhe}} I've rephrased the sentences with close paraphrasing issues and reduced the article's dependency on quotes - it should be okay now '''''[[User:Satellizer|<font color="#00B7EB">Satellizer el Bridget</font>]] [[User talk:Satellizer|<font color="magenta"><sup>(Talk)</sup></font>]]''''' 11:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thanks for fixing the issues. Good to go. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 19:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 19:43, 29 April 2019
DYK toolbox |
---|
K/DA
- ... that a virtual K-pop group composed of video game characters once topped Billboard's World Digital Song Sales chart in 2018? Source: here (Source #16 in article)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Alisa Takigawa
- Comment: A interesting article with an interesting hook I reckon. Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 12:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
Created by Satellizer (talk). Self-nominated at 12:21, 26 April 2019 (UTC).
Article is new enough, long enough, neutral, and well referenced. Hook is very interesting and verified with provided reference. QPQ is done. There are, however, some issues with close paraphrasing. Also Earwig's alarmingly high copyvio risk is mostly due to quotations, there are some unquoted phrases that are quite close to the sources. Please see Earwig report . -Zanhe (talk) 22:41, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping is close paraphrasing here the only issue or are the quotations also excessive? I assume the course of action now is to reword the offending phrases as per Earwig's report (where possible) - do I need to also cut down on quotations? Thanks, Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 06:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'd personally prefer fewer quotations, but that's not a DYK requirement. For the purpose of DYK, you only need to reword the offending sentences. -Zanhe (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I've rephrased the sentences with close paraphrasing issues and reduced the article's dependency on quotes - it should be okay now Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 11:30, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- I'd personally prefer fewer quotations, but that's not a DYK requirement. For the purpose of DYK, you only need to reword the offending sentences. -Zanhe (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping is close paraphrasing here the only issue or are the quotations also excessive? I assume the course of action now is to reword the offending phrases as per Earwig's report (where possible) - do I need to also cut down on quotations? Thanks, Satellizer el Bridget (Talk) 06:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)