Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/KOF Index of Globalization"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(link article title)
imported>Mifter
(flag concerns)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] - While the length and date are good, Earwigs Copyvio detector [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=KOF+Index+of+Globalization&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0&noskip=1 flagged the article] with a 91% confidence rating.  From a spot check it appears the article is a close paraphrasing/partial copy of [http://www.socionauki.ru/journal/articles/126981/ this].  I am also concerned about the article meeting potentially not meeting [[WP:GNG|our general notability guidelines]].  Sorry to be the bearer of bad news.  [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 05:49, 11 February 2017

KOF Index of Globalization

  • ... that the KOF Index of Globalization measures countries on the economic, political and social aspects of globalization? Source: "The KOF Index of Globalization is an Index which measures the three main dimensions of globalization." ([1])
    • ALT1:... that the KOF Index of Globalization considers economic, social and political aspects of globalization? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Moved to mainspace by User:Triptothecottage (talk). Nominated by Triptothecottage (talk) at 11:49, 10 February 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg - While the length and date are good, Earwigs Copyvio detector flagged the article with a 91% confidence rating. From a spot check it appears the article is a close paraphrasing/partial copy of this. I am also concerned about the article meeting potentially not meeting our general notability guidelines. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news. Mifter (talk) 05:49, 11 February 2017 (UTC)