Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kalavati Devi"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>DiplomatTesterMan (reviewing) |
imported>DiplomatTesterMan (two clarifications needed) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:* {{reviewing}} [[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DTM]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 05:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | :* {{reviewing}} [[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DTM]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 05:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :: Article created on 5 April 2020 and nominated within time. It is long enough and Earwigs checks out - "Violation Unlikely". The hook image is used in the aritcle, is clear enough, and is licensed adequately. No issues with the first hook. | |
| + | :: Just two clarifications needed. One - Is 'The Logical Indian' (thelogicalindian.com) a reliable ''enough'' source here? Two - I am a bit unsure about whether a QPQ is needed here or not...? [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] [[User:DiplomatTesterMan|DTM]] ([[User talk:DiplomatTesterMan|talk]]) 06:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 06:14, 17 April 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kalavati Devi
- ... that Kalavati Devi (pictured) built 4,000 toilets so people in Kanpur didn't have to live in a "living hell"?responsible for building more than 4,000 toilets in villages in and around Kanpur.... living hell
- ALT1:... that women would "sacrifice their dignity every single day" until Kalavati Devi (pictured) built 4,000 toilets?sacrifice their dignity every single day
- Comment: Titodutta's idea to nom this - thanks Tittodutta
Created/expanded by Victuallers (talk) and Titodutta (talk). Nominated by Victuallers (talk) at 12:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC).
- Template:Reviewing DTM (talk) 05:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
- Article created on 5 April 2020 and nominated within time. It is long enough and Earwigs checks out - "Violation Unlikely". The hook image is used in the aritcle, is clear enough, and is licensed adequately. No issues with the first hook.
- Just two clarifications needed. One - Is 'The Logical Indian' (thelogicalindian.com) a reliable enough source here? Two - I am a bit unsure about whether a QPQ is needed here or not...?
DTM (talk) 06:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
