Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Karnes Hollow"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jakec (rp) |
imported>Yoninah (restoring tick for original hook) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, date, hook's ref verified. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent close paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Good to go. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 02:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Length, date, hook's ref verified. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent close paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Good to go. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 02:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] With all the good work you're doing to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Pennsylvania tributaries, Jakec, I understand it's hard to come up with unique hooks. This one seems a little flat, though. I wish we could spice it up for us non-river aficionados, like: | ::* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] With all the good work you're doing to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Pennsylvania tributaries, Jakec, I understand it's hard to come up with unique hooks. This one seems a little flat, though. I wish we could spice it up for us non-river aficionados, like: | ||
| − | ::*'''ALT1''': ... that you'll see [[colluvium]] and [[alluvium]] in '''[[Karnes Hollow]]'''? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | + | ::*'''ALT1''': <s>... that you'll see [[colluvium]] and [[alluvium]] in '''[[Karnes Hollow]]'''?</s>[[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC) |
:::*{{ping|Yoninah}} ALT1 sounds good. I don't think it's any more remarkable that alt0, but I suppose it might ''sound'' more interesting to a layperson. {{ping|Rosiestep}} Perhaps you could review ALT1 as well? --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 22:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | :::*{{ping|Yoninah}} ALT1 sounds good. I don't think it's any more remarkable that alt0, but I suppose it might ''sound'' more interesting to a layperson. {{ping|Rosiestep}} Perhaps you could review ALT1 as well? --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 22:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{u|Jakec|Jakob}}: I like the original hook, but, no worries, if you'll add inline citations to the colluvium and alluvium sentences, and then ping me, I'll review for ALT1. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 01:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC) | ::::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] {{u|Jakec|Jakob}}: I like the original hook, but, no worries, if you'll add inline citations to the colluvium and alluvium sentences, and then ping me, I'll review for ALT1. --[[User:Rosiestep|Rosiestep]] ([[User talk:Rosiestep|talk]]) 01:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::*{{ping|Rosiestep}} I also personally like ALT0 and am not withdrawing it. I suppose we'll let the prep builder decide. Done, anyhow. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 20:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | :::::*{{ping|Rosiestep}} I also personally like ALT0 and am not withdrawing it. I suppose we'll let the prep builder decide. Done, anyhow. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 20:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::::*More time gives me more perspective. I admit ALT1 is a little flippant. Perhaps this sourced sentence from the article would work better: | ::::::*More time gives me more perspective. I admit ALT1 is a little flippant. Perhaps this sourced sentence from the article would work better: | ||
| − | ::::::*'''ALT2''': ... that '''[[Karnes Hollow]]''' is an unnamed stream that takes the name of the valley through which it flows? [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | + | ::::::*'''ALT2''': <s>... that '''[[Karnes Hollow]]''' is an unnamed stream that takes the name of the valley through which it flows? </s>[[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC) |
:::::::*There are thousands of those in PA; they aren't even particularly rare or remarkable. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 22:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | :::::::*There are thousands of those in PA; they aren't even particularly rare or remarkable. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' 22:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] OK, I give up. Restoring tick for original hook per Rosiestep's review. Best, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:24, 21 March 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Karnes Hollow
- ... that Karnes Hollow is named after a valley whose etymology is unknown?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 14:24, 15 March 2015 (UTC).
Length, date, hook's ref verified. All non-lede paragraphs have refs; all refs appear to be RS. No apparent close paraphrasing issues. QPQ done. Good to go. --Rosiestep (talk) 02:12, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
With all the good work you're doing to expand Wikipedia's coverage of Pennsylvania tributaries, Jakec, I understand it's hard to come up with unique hooks. This one seems a little flat, though. I wish we could spice it up for us non-river aficionados, like:- ALT1:
... that you'll see colluvium and alluvium in Karnes Hollow?Yoninah (talk) 22:05, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping ALT1 sounds good. I don't think it's any more remarkable that alt0, but I suppose it might sound more interesting to a layperson. Template:Ping Perhaps you could review ALT1 as well? --Jakob (talk) 22:42, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Template:U: I like the original hook, but, no worries, if you'll add inline citations to the colluvium and alluvium sentences, and then ping me, I'll review for ALT1. --Rosiestep (talk) 01:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I also personally like ALT0 and am not withdrawing it. I suppose we'll let the prep builder decide. Done, anyhow. --Jakob (talk) 20:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
- More time gives me more perspective. I admit ALT1 is a little flippant. Perhaps this sourced sentence from the article would work better:
- ALT2:
... that Karnes Hollow is an unnamed stream that takes the name of the valley through which it flows?Yoninah (talk) 21:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)