Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kate Claghorn"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 3) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<small>Created by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 05:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Newness, length and article quality are all fine. QPQ done, no copyvio issues found, image is PD. The only reason for my question mark is that I think it would be better to have statement attributed within the article to the authors ("eg Allerfeldt and Black (2003) described this book as ..." and the hook altered slightly to "has been called" instead of became, to make the origin of the quote clearer. < | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Newness, length and article quality are all fine. QPQ done, no copyvio issues found, image is PD. The only reason for my question mark is that I think it would be better to have statement attributed within the article to the authors ("eg Allerfeldt and Black (2003) described this book as ..." and the hook altered slightly to "has been called" instead of became, to make the origin of the quote clearer. [[User:January|<span style="color:navy;">January</span>]] <small>([[User talk:January|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</small> 10:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC) |
::*{{done}}. Thanks for the suggestion. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 16:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | ::*{{done}}. Thanks for the suggestion. —[[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]) 16:51, 16 July 2016 (UTC) | ||
| − | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Ready to go. < | + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Ready to go. [[User:January|<span style="color:navy;">January</span>]] <small>([[User talk:January|<span style="color:navy;">talk</span>]])</small> 19:36, 16 July 2016 (UTC) |
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 11:07, 28 January 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:10, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kate Claghorn
Kate Claghorn, circa 1912
Kate Claghorn, circa 1912
- ... that a 1923 book by Progressive Era activist Kate Claghorn (pictured) has been called "the one significant contemporary study of the immigrant and the American legal system"?
- Reviewed: Fresno kangaroo rat
Created by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 05:03, 16 July 2016 (UTC).
- 16px Newness, length and article quality are all fine. QPQ done, no copyvio issues found, image is PD. The only reason for my question mark is that I think it would be better to have statement attributed within the article to the authors ("eg Allerfeldt and Black (2003) described this book as ..." and the hook altered slightly to "has been called" instead of became, to make the origin of the quote clearer. January (talk) 10:16, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
