Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kathy Bardswick"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Edwardx (review started) |
imported>Edwardx (reviewed) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough. Long enough. QPQ done. Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "Violation Unlikely 27.0% confidence", and any identical phrases appeared to be straightforward facts. Spot checking with dup detector found no significant close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. NPOV. All paras cited. I'd prefer not to see cites in the lead para, with those facts repeated and cited elsewhere. The second fact in the main hook is cited, but to a 2004 source! I think our readers will reasonably infer that the 12/500 statistic is contemporary. Is there a better source, and an up-to-date number? The article lead para mentions, "one of a handful of women at the helm of the top 100 companies in Canada". Is it possible to get a precise number? The ALT1 hook fact is cited and checks out. Nice article and both hooks are interesting! [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 13:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 13:07, 31 December 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kathy Bardswick
- ... that Kathy Bardswick, president and CEO of The Co-operators Group, is one of only 12 female CEOs in the top 500 companies in Canada?
- ALT1:... that Kathy Bardswick got her first job at The Co-operators Group when her mother applied for her and pretended she was Kathy when the company called back?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Sodder children disappearance
- Comment: Created for Women in Red – Women in Leadership
Created by Yoninah (talk). Self-nominated at 22:21, 28 December 2015 (UTC).
New enough. Long enough. QPQ done. Earwig's Copyvio Detector returns "Violation Unlikely 27.0% confidence", and any identical phrases appeared to be straightforward facts. Spot checking with dup detector found no significant close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations or plagiarism. NPOV. All paras cited. I'd prefer not to see cites in the lead para, with those facts repeated and cited elsewhere. The second fact in the main hook is cited, but to a 2004 source! I think our readers will reasonably infer that the 12/500 statistic is contemporary. Is there a better source, and an up-to-date number? The article lead para mentions, "one of a handful of women at the helm of the top 100 companies in Canada". Is it possible to get a precise number? The ALT1 hook fact is cited and checks out. Nice article and both hooks are interesting! Edwardx (talk) 13:06, 31 December 2015 (UTC)