Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Katyn Commission"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Poeticbent
(feedback)
imported>Edwardx
(reply)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
:::::I just think that it's a bit too ambiguous at the moment, in terms of whether its part of the Commission, the Soviet Union, the world, the Polish. What about something like: "were denied by the Soviets for seventy years"? <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 08:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::I just think that it's a bit too ambiguous at the moment, in terms of whether its part of the Commission, the Soviet Union, the world, the Polish. What about something like: "were denied by the Soviets for seventy years"? <b>[[User:Callanecc|Callanecc]]</b> ([[User talk:Callanecc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Callanecc|contribs]] • [[Special:Log/Callanecc|logs]]) 08:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::I see your point, but we are running into a problem here. The article says "in November 2010 the Russian State Duma admitted" to ''Soviet'' responsibility, however, the Soviet Union disintegrated a decade earlier. So the denial continued beyond the Soviet "60" and on to "70" mentioned in the hook. [[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<font style="font-size:7.0pt;color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font>]] 09:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::I see your point, but we are running into a problem here. The article says "in November 2010 the Russian State Duma admitted" to ''Soviet'' responsibility, however, the Soviet Union disintegrated a decade earlier. So the denial continued beyond the Soviet "60" and on to "70" mentioned in the hook. [[User:Poeticbent|<font face="Papyrus" color="darkblue"><b>Poeticbent</b></font>]] [[User_talk:Poeticbent|<font style="font-size:7.0pt;color:#FFFFFF;font-weight:bold;background:#FF88AF;border:1px solid #DF2929;padding:0.0em 0.2em;">talk</font>]] 09:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 
+
::::::: When reviewing this nom, I did consider adding "by the Soviets", but as Poeticbent states, who else would have an interest in denying it?  I also realised that there was the possibility for Soviet/Russian confusion, so decided to leave it as it stands.  In any event, the hook doesn't have to tell the whole story. [[User:Edwardx|Edwardx]] ([[User talk:Edwardx|talk]]) 10:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:35, 30 November 2013

Katyn Commission

Katyn Commission, Berlin, May 4, 1943

Created by Poeticbent (talk). Self nominated at 20:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC).

  • 16px New enough, long enough, hook content cited in article, which is well cited generally. Image is widely used on Wikipedia in several languages. Edwardx (talk) 11:23, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
The article explains it. The perpetrators are already named and linked; no-one else would have a stake in denying the facts. In my opinion, there's no need to say it twice. Poeticbent talk 08:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I just think that it's a bit too ambiguous at the moment, in terms of whether its part of the Commission, the Soviet Union, the world, the Polish. What about something like: "were denied by the Soviets for seventy years"? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
I see your point, but we are running into a problem here. The article says "in November 2010 the Russian State Duma admitted" to Soviet responsibility, however, the Soviet Union disintegrated a decade earlier. So the denial continued beyond the Soviet "60" and on to "70" mentioned in the hook. Poeticbent talk 09:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
When reviewing this nom, I did consider adding "by the Soviets", but as Poeticbent states, who else would have an interest in denying it? I also realised that there was the possibility for Soviet/Russian confusion, so decided to leave it as it stands. In any event, the hook doesn't have to tell the whole story. Edwardx (talk) 10:35, 30 November 2013 (UTC)