Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kepler-47c"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
imported>Jonesey95
m (Fix Linter errors using AutoEd)
 
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Greengreengreenred|Greengreengreenred]] ([[User talk:Greengreengreenred|talk]]).  Self nom at 06:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Greengreengreenred|Greengreengreenred]] ([[User talk:Greengreengreenred|talk]]).  Self nom at 06:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
  
:*Article length (2190 characters), date of creation (5 January) satisfy criteria. It is sourced and neutral, and contains inline citations where required. Hook length is good, but hook may need to be made more enticing to the average reader. <font color="#8b4513">[[User:Mindmatrix|Mind]]</font><font color="#ee8811">[[User_talk:Mindmatrix|matrix]]</font> 17:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
+
:*Article length (2190 characters), date of creation (5 January) satisfy criteria. It is sourced and neutral, and contains inline citations where required. Hook length is good, but hook may need to be made more enticing to the average reader. [[User:Mindmatrix|<span style="color:#8b4513;">Mind</span>]][[User_talk:Mindmatrix|<span style="color:#ee8811;">matrix</span>]] 17:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 
::*New suggestion:
 
::*New suggestion:
 
::: ... that [[Kepler-47]] is the first binary star system to be discovered to have multiple orbiting planets, '''[[Kepler-47c|one of which]]''' orbits in its [[habitable zone]]?
 
::: ... that [[Kepler-47]] is the first binary star system to be discovered to have multiple orbiting planets, '''[[Kepler-47c|one of which]]''' orbits in its [[habitable zone]]?
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] (Hook review only) I think that's an improvement on the original. Based on that and the previous review, this one is now good to go. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 16:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
::::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] (Hook review only) I think that's an improvement on the original. Based on that and the previous review, this one is now good to go. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 16:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 17:00, 30 January 2019

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Kepler-47c

Created by Greengreengreenred (talk). Self nom at 06:04, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Article length (2190 characters), date of creation (5 January) satisfy criteria. It is sourced and neutral, and contains inline citations where required. Hook length is good, but hook may need to be made more enticing to the average reader. Mindmatrix 17:02, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
  • New suggestion:
... that Kepler-47 is the first binary star system to be discovered to have multiple orbiting planets, one of which orbits in its habitable zone?
Symbol confirmed.svg (Hook review only) I think that's an improvement on the original. Based on that and the previous review, this one is now good to go. Miyagawa (talk) 16:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)