Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Keturah"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nvvchar
(review)
imported>Richwales
(removed "still pending final approval" tag on "Reviewed:" item)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
:* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Keturah]]''', the woman [[Abraham]] married after the death of [[Sarah]], has been called "the most ignored significant person in the [[Torah]]"?
 
:* '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Keturah]]''', the woman [[Abraham]] married after the death of [[Sarah]], has been called "the most ignored significant person in the [[Torah]]"?
:* ''Reviewed'': True Detective (season 1) — still pending final approval
+
:* ''Reviewed'': True Detective (season 1)
 
:* ''Comment'': ALT1 more precisely relates what the source said; however, since some non-Jewish readers may not be familiar with the term "[[Torah]]", substituting "Hebrew scriptures" should adequately capture the meaning and is probably more likely to catch readers' attention.
 
:* ''Comment'': ALT1 more precisely relates what the source said; however, since some non-Jewish readers may not be familiar with the term "[[Torah]]", substituting "Hebrew scriptures" should adequately capture the meaning and is probably more likely to catch readers' attention.
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Richwales|Richwales]] ([[User talk:Richwales|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Richwales|Richwales]] ([[User talk:Richwales|talk]]). Self-nominated at 06:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC).</small>

Revision as of 14:47, 17 July 2015

Keturah

  • ALT1:... that Keturah, the woman Abraham married after the death of Sarah, has been called "the most ignored significant person in the Torah"?
  • Reviewed: True Detective (season 1)
  • Comment: ALT1 more precisely relates what the source said; however, since some non-Jewish readers may not be familiar with the term "Torah", substituting "Hebrew scriptures" should adequately capture the meaning and is probably more likely to catch readers' attention.

Improved to Good Article status by Richwales (talk). Self-nominated at 06:31, 17 July 2015 (UTC).

  • 16px It is GA promoted on 16th and posted by due date. Long enough and well referenced article. Hook reference to both hooks verified. No copy vio noted. QPQ needs to be done for a green tick. --Nvvchar. 14:34, 17 July 2015 (UTC)