Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kielce Bus Station"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter I. Vardy (further comment) |
imported>Piotrus |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
|monthyear=January 2014 | |monthyear=January 2014 | ||
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no--> | |passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no--> | ||
| − | | 2= | + | | 2= |
{{DYKC}} | {{DYKC}} | ||
====Kielce Bus Station==== | ====Kielce Bus Station==== | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::*@[[User:Peter I. Vardy]] I think this is just a rewording of the referenced claim from the second paragraph. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 09:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ::*@[[User:Peter I. Vardy]] I think this is just a rewording of the referenced claim from the second paragraph. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 09:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::*It may be, but despite reading and re-reading, I cannot see or gather the phrase I quoted above from the article itself. But I suppose someone else might. Sorry. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 11:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | :::*It may be, but despite reading and re-reading, I cannot see or gather the phrase I quoted above from the article itself. But I suppose someone else might. Sorry. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 11:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::::*@[[User:Peter I. Vardy]]IMHO | + | ::::*@[[User:Peter I. Vardy]] IMHO "unique and novel" is a clear synonym of innovative. --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 12:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC) |
:::::*Yes, I accept that, but "one of the most innovative" (hook) is not the same as "one of the most valuable" (quote in article). I'm not convinced that it is OK to link two separate quotes in this way. It only needs a little sorting out of the wording for the hook to accurately reflect the article. Maybe just leave out the word "most". --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 14:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | :::::*Yes, I accept that, but "one of the most innovative" (hook) is not the same as "one of the most valuable" (quote in article). I'm not convinced that it is OK to link two separate quotes in this way. It only needs a little sorting out of the wording for the hook to accurately reflect the article. Maybe just leave out the word "most". --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 14:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | @[[User:Peter I. Vardy]] Hmmm, how about ALT1: --<sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> reply here</font>]]</sub> 21:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | * ... that the [[UFO]]-like '''[[Kielce Bus Station]]''' ''(pictured)'' has been praised as "one of the most valuable" architectural designs of the last decades of the [[People's Republic of Poland]]? | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:05, 9 January 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kielce Bus Station
- ... that the UFO-like Kielce Bus Station (pictured) has been praised as one of the most innovative architectural designs of the People's Republic of Poland?
- Reviewed: Prince of Wales F.C.
Created by Piotrus (talk). Self nominated at 13:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC).
- 16px Date, length OK. That the building looks like a UFO is confirmed by an online source in English. But I am not sure about "one of the most innovative architectural designs". It does not say this in the article. It may well do so in the sources, but these are in Polish, so I cannot confirm it. Should the hook, or the article, be re-worded? Image free of copyright. Article well referenced. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- @User:Peter I. Vardy I think this is just a rewording of the referenced claim from the second paragraph. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- It may be, but despite reading and re-reading, I cannot see or gather the phrase I quoted above from the article itself. But I suppose someone else might. Sorry. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 11:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- @User:Peter I. Vardy IMHO "unique and novel" is a clear synonym of innovative. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- Yes, I accept that, but "one of the most innovative" (hook) is not the same as "one of the most valuable" (quote in article). I'm not convinced that it is OK to link two separate quotes in this way. It only needs a little sorting out of the wording for the hook to accurately reflect the article. Maybe just leave out the word "most". --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 14:30, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
@User:Peter I. Vardy Hmmm, how about ALT1: --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:05, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
- ... that the UFO-like Kielce Bus Station (pictured) has been praised as "one of the most valuable" architectural designs of the last decades of the People's Republic of Poland?
