Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Kingston Lacy"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (Tweaking hook) |
imported>Drchriswilliams (Review completed, good to go) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | * ... that when accepted by the [[National Trust]] in 1982, the '''[[Kingston Lacy]]''' estate was the largest bequest they had ever received? | + | * ... that when accepted by the [[National Trust for Places of Historic Interest or Natural Beauty|National Trust]] in 1982, the '''[[Kingston Lacy]]''' estate was the largest bequest they had ever received? |
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lena Sundström|Lena Sundström]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Lena Sundström|Lena Sundström]] | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] This article was passed as good article on 28 August. A large expansion of the article began on 24 August taking main text from 1480 words to 2151 words Now long enough, with content that is written in a neutral style and that is well-referenced with inline citations to a selection of reliable sources. The article appears free of close paraphrasing or copyright violations although I note one major source is not available online, so this is accepted in good faith. I tweaked the National Trust link in the hook. Aside from that, the hook is short, interesting and properly constructed. The hook is verified within the article by an online source. The image is in the article, does work at the small DYK image size; it was uploaded in 2003 and has an appropriate license. QPQ has been met. Good to go. [[User:Drchriswilliams|Drchriswilliams]] ([[User talk:Drchriswilliams|talk]]) 07:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 07:18, 3 September 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Kingston Lacy
- ... that when accepted by the National Trust in 1982, the Kingston Lacy estate was the largest bequest they had ever received?
- Reviewed: Lena Sundström
Improved to Good Article status by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 05:34, 3 September 2016 (UTC).
This article was passed as good article on 28 August. A large expansion of the article began on 24 August taking main text from 1480 words to 2151 words Now long enough, with content that is written in a neutral style and that is well-referenced with inline citations to a selection of reliable sources. The article appears free of close paraphrasing or copyright violations although I note one major source is not available online, so this is accepted in good faith. I tweaked the National Trust link in the hook. Aside from that, the hook is short, interesting and properly constructed. The hook is verified within the article by an online source. The image is in the article, does work at the small DYK image size; it was uploaded in 2003 and has an appropriate license. QPQ has been met. Good to go. Drchriswilliams (talk) 07:17, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
