Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Köpenick's week of bloodshed"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Feminist (add QPQ) |
imported>Biruitorul (tick) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] |
| + | :*The article is newly written. | ||
| + | :*The article has not previously featured on the Main Page. | ||
| + | :*The article is long enough. | ||
| + | :*Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources. | ||
| + | :*No disputes surround the article. | ||
| + | :*I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation. | ||
| + | :*I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. The wording appears original. | ||
| + | :*I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account. | ||
| + | :*The article is not up for AfD. | ||
| + | :*German-language hook checks out as far as the original and ALT2 are concerned. The formatting is somewhat chaotic - no citations are supposed to be in the lead, for example - but the hook does pass. - [[User:Biruitorul|Biruitorul]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Biruitorul|Talk]]</sup></small> 18:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:47, 25 September 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Köpenick's week of bloodshed
- ... that detainees in the Köpenick's week of bloodshed were subjected to humiliation, torture and murder?
- ALT1:... that in the Köpenick's week of bloodshed, roughly 500 opponents of the Nazi Party were detained by the local SA?
- ALT2:... that at least 23 people died in the Köpenick's week of bloodshed?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Call (novel)
Created by Charles01 (talk). Nominated by SSTflyer (talk) at 12:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC).

- The article is newly written.
- The article has not previously featured on the Main Page.
- The article is long enough.
- Citations are sufficient and drawn from reliable published sources.
- No disputes surround the article.
- I see nothing that might be construed as a BLP violation.
- I can find no particular issues with plagiarism. The wording appears original.
- I see no neutrality issues, either. This is a straightforward account.
- The article is not up for AfD.
- German-language hook checks out as far as the original and ALT2 are concerned. The formatting is somewhat chaotic - no citations are supposed to be in the lead, for example - but the hook does pass. - Biruitorul Talk 18:47, 25 September 2015 (UTC)