Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/L'eggs"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Ivar the Boneful (all good) |
imported>Yoninah (to Prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from October 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 01:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|L'eggs}} | {{DYK header|L'eggs}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=L'eggs|L'eggs}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=L'eggs|L'eggs}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that actress [[Jamie Lee Curtis]] insured her legs for $1 million after signing an endorsement with '''[[L'eggs]]''' pantyhose? <small>''Forbes'' magazine article segment "Gambling on gams" confirmed the insurance with Lloyds of London for one million US dollars. A PDF of the 1996 page can be seen [https://bohnerbespoke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Informer-3-25-96.pdf here].</small> | * ... that actress [[Jamie Lee Curtis]] insured her legs for $1 million after signing an endorsement with '''[[L'eggs]]''' pantyhose? <small>''Forbes'' magazine article segment "Gambling on gams" confirmed the insurance with Lloyds of London for one million US dollars. A PDF of the 1996 page can be seen [https://bohnerbespoke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Informer-3-25-96.pdf here].</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[L'eggs]]''' pantyhose in the 1970s were delivered to stores mostly by women? <small>''New York Times'' says "It sold to retailers on a consignment basis and hired its own distributors, most of them women..."</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[L'eggs]]''' pantyhose in the 1970s were delivered to stores mostly by women? <small>''New York Times'' says "It sold to retailers on a consignment basis and hired its own distributors, most of them women..."</small> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 12: | ||
:* ''Comment'': The article is now at 8609 characters (1356 words), an 11× increase from two days ago when it was 781 characters (119 words). The 5× point was reached on October 10, so that's the relevant day for DYK. | :* ''Comment'': The article is now at 8609 characters (1356 words), an 11× increase from two days ago when it was 781 characters (119 words). The 5× point was reached on October 10, so that's the relevant day for DYK. | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC).</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article is newly 5x expanded and long enough. No neutrality concerns. Inline citations are used throughout the article and the sources used appear reliable. No copyvio hits on Earwig. The three hooks suggested are all referenced and interesting; personally I would probably go with the first. QPQ is complete and the images used in the article have correct licences and non-free use rationale where applicable. Nice work [[User:Binksternet]], it's rare to see such a detailed article on a clothing brand and you've obviously done a fair bit of research. [[User:Ivar the Boneful|Ivar the Boneful]] ([[User talk:Ivar the Boneful|talk]]) 15:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 01:43, 21 October 2020
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 01:43, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
L'eggs
- ... that actress Jamie Lee Curtis insured her legs for $1 million after signing an endorsement with L'eggs pantyhose? Forbes magazine article segment "Gambling on gams" confirmed the insurance with Lloyds of London for one million US dollars. A PDF of the 1996 page can be seen here.
- ALT1:... that L'eggs pantyhose in the 1970s were delivered to stores mostly by women? New York Times says "It sold to retailers on a consignment basis and hired its own distributors, most of them women..."
- ALT2:... that the plastic egg packaging of L'eggs pantyhose has been fitted with electronic noisemakers to help blind children enjoy an egg hunt? 1985 report of audible eggs starting in 1980 in Florida. 1997 report of audible eggs in SoCal going for 11 years.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Mats Löfving
- Comment: The article is now at 8609 characters (1356 words), an 11× increase from two days ago when it was 781 characters (119 words). The 5× point was reached on October 10, so that's the relevant day for DYK.
5x expanded by Binksternet (talk). Self-nominated at 21:54, 11 October 2020 (UTC).
Article is newly 5x expanded and long enough. No neutrality concerns. Inline citations are used throughout the article and the sources used appear reliable. No copyvio hits on Earwig. The three hooks suggested are all referenced and interesting; personally I would probably go with the first. QPQ is complete and the images used in the article have correct licences and non-free use rationale where applicable. Nice work User:Binksternet, it's rare to see such a detailed article on a clothing brand and you've obviously done a fair bit of research. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 15:01, 13 October 2020 (UTC)