Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Labial fusion"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>97198 (nom) |
imported>Hamiltonstone (good to go) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] five times expansion recent enough, article is long enough. Hook is short, clear and interesting. QPQ done. All of the article is well cited, including the hook. I am not able to access the cited works, but they are sound academic published material. Not relevant for DYK but as an aside, the editors might want to check whether a couple of the later cites (notes 10 and 11) meet [[WP:MEDRS]]. Regardless of that, this is good to go. [[User:Hamiltonstone|hamiltonstone]] ([[User talk:Hamiltonstone|talk]]) 13:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 13:58, 10 May 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Labial fusion
- ... that most cases of fusion of the labia minora do not require treatment since they resolve naturally?
- Reviewed: Ladies' Scottish Climbing Club
5x expanded by 97198 (talk). Self nominated at 11:59, 10 May 2014 (UTC).
five times expansion recent enough, article is long enough. Hook is short, clear and interesting. QPQ done. All of the article is well cited, including the hook. I am not able to access the cited works, but they are sound academic published material. Not relevant for DYK but as an aside, the editors might want to check whether a couple of the later cites (notes 10 and 11) meet WP:MEDRS. Regardless of that, this is good to go. hamiltonstone (talk) 13:58, 10 May 2014 (UTC)