Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Language"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth (OK) |
imported>Hawkeye7 (Passed - moved to prep area 1) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from September 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 21:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Language==== | ====Language==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Language|Language}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Language|Language}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that while '''[[language]]s''' have always gone extinct throughout human history, they have been disappearing at an accelerated rate in the 20th and 21st centuries? | * ... that while '''[[language]]s''' have always gone extinct throughout human history, they have been disappearing at an accelerated rate in the 20th and 21st centuries? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* '''ALT1''': ... that 50–90% of the world's 6,000–7,000 '''[[language]]s''' will likely become [[language death|extinct]] by the year 2100? | :* '''ALT1''': ... that 50–90% of the world's 6,000–7,000 '''[[language]]s''' will likely become [[language death|extinct]] by the year 2100? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': Not a self-nomination | :* ''Reviewed'': Not a self-nomination | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Maunus|Maunus]] and [[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter Isotalo]] ([[User talk:Peter Isotalo|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) at 18:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:Maunus|Maunus]] and [[User:Peter Isotalo|Peter Isotalo]] ([[User talk:Peter Isotalo|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:Oceanh|Oceanh]] ([[User talk:Oceanh|talk]]) at 18:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] This substantial and impressive newly promoted GA has been nominated in good time. Either of the hooks could be used, both having inline citations to offline sources. The article is neutral but I made no attempt to consider whether there were any close paraphrasing or other copyright issues due to the offline nature of the sources in general. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 21:12, 26 September 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:12, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Language
- ... that while languages have always gone extinct throughout human history, they have been disappearing at an accelerated rate in the 20th and 21st centuries?
Improved to Good Article status by Maunus and Peter Isotalo (talk). Nominated by Oceanh (talk) at 18:26, 20 September 2014 (UTC).
- 16px This substantial and impressive newly promoted GA has been nominated in good time. Either of the hooks could be used, both having inline citations to offline sources. The article is neutral but I made no attempt to consider whether there were any close paraphrasing or other copyright issues due to the offline nature of the sources in general. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:49, 25 September 2014 (UTC)