Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Laurel Run (Mill Creek)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jakec
(nom)
 
imported>Prioryman
(Good to go)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yeah, it's a pretty bad picture. :-) I'd suggest looking to see if a modern picture is available. Other than that, the article looks fine; new enough, long enough, well-written and laid out, and reliably sourced. The hook fact is also specifically and reliably sourced. This one's good to go. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 12:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:40, 4 March 2015

Laurel Run (Mill Creek)

Laurel Run near the turn of the 20th century

  • ... that Laurel Run (pictured) used to be "of considerable size and importance", but is now a "trickling flow of water"?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 01:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Yeah, it's a pretty bad picture. :-) I'd suggest looking to see if a modern picture is available. Other than that, the article looks fine; new enough, long enough, well-written and laid out, and reliably sourced. The hook fact is also specifically and reliably sourced. This one's good to go. Prioryman (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)