Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Laurel Run (Mill Creek)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jakec (nom) |
imported>Prioryman (Good to go) |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--> | --> | ||
− | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Yeah, it's a pretty bad picture. :-) I'd suggest looking to see if a modern picture is available. Other than that, the article looks fine; new enough, long enough, well-written and laid out, and reliably sourced. The hook fact is also specifically and reliably sourced. This one's good to go. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 12:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 12:40, 4 March 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Laurel Run (Mill Creek)
- ... that Laurel Run (pictured) used to be "of considerable size and importance", but is now a "trickling flow of water"?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Armée de Terre (cycling team)
- Comment: I know the picture is terrible, so I won't be offended if you don't include it.
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self nominated at 01:46, 28 February 2015 (UTC).
Yeah, it's a pretty bad picture. :-) I'd suggest looking to see if a modern picture is available. Other than that, the article looks fine; new enough, long enough, well-written and laid out, and reliably sourced. The hook fact is also specifically and reliably sourced. This one's good to go. Prioryman (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2015 (UTC)