Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lauren Ward"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>TonyTheTiger (further) |
imported>BlueMoonset (QPQ satisfied; restoring approval) |
||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::*I'm unable to give QPQ credit for the above review: no icon was given to indicate the review status, and the "date, length and ref check out" was contradicted by another reviewer, who pointed out that the main hook (and that section of the article) was not supported by the referenced material. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | :::*I'm unable to give QPQ credit for the above review: no icon was given to indicate the review status, and the "date, length and ref check out" was contradicted by another reviewer, who pointed out that the main hook (and that section of the article) was not supported by the referenced material. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 16:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
::::*P.S. that is highly unusual. QPQs are usually given for reviews in progress.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | ::::*P.S. that is highly unusual. QPQs are usually given for reviews in progress.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::*Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise)]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 17:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | + | :::::*Not unusual in my experience. QPQ, by its name (quid pro quo) implies equivalence, so both reviews (nominator's and reviewer's) must be completed. Note that this doesn't mean either has to be an approval, but it has to be a full review. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC) |
| + | ::*Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise)]].--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 17:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)] | ||
| + | :::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ satisfied; restoring original tick per SusanLesch. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:13, 8 June 2013
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lauren Ward
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Lauren Ward
- Keala Settle
- Hands on a Hardbody (musical) )
- ... that Lauren Ward and Keala Settle are nominees for Best Featured Actress in a Musical at the 67th Tony Awards for performances in Matilda the Musical and Hands on a Hardbody, respectively?
- Reviewed: Not a self-nom
Created/expanded by HesioneHushabye (talk), Flami72 (talk), TonyTheTiger (talk). Nominated by TonyTheTiger (talk) at 05:46, 7 May 2013 (UTC).
- This may be part of a potential 67th Tony Awards day on DYK. They air at 0:00 on June 10.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:48, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Hook source checks out and so does the date. Ready to go. Tony, if you are nominating this for a specific date, what about putting it there? -SusanLesch (talk) 15:47, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Moving it now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:46, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
I think at least one QPQ is needed here. While the claim is "not a self-nom", TonyTheTiger is given created/expanded credit not only above, but also in the DYKmake templates (rather than DYKnom) for all three articles. That looks inaccurate, actually: while a significant contribution was made to Hands on a Hardbody, I don't see anything significant for the other two. Still, that significant contribution (and DYKmake) warrants a QPQ for this nomination; I've changed the other two to DYKnom templates. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:00, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Reviewing Template:Did you know nominations/Wilkes-Barre and Hazleton Railway.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 08:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm unable to give QPQ credit for the above review: no icon was given to indicate the review status, and the "date, length and ref check out" was contradicted by another reviewer, who pointed out that the main hook (and that section of the article) was not supported by the referenced material. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- P.S. that is highly unusual. QPQs are usually given for reviews in progress.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not unusual in my experience. QPQ, by its name (quid pro quo) implies equivalence, so both reviews (nominator's and reviewer's) must be completed. Note that this doesn't mean either has to be an approval, but it has to be a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Bound (Star Trek: Enterprise).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)]
- QPQ satisfied; restoring original tick per SusanLesch. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
