Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Le Conte's thrasher"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>LeftAire |
imported>Gaff (looks good) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
====Le Conte's thrasher==== | ====Le Conte's thrasher==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Le Conte's thrasher|Le Conte's thrasher}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Le Conte's thrasher|Le Conte's thrasher}} | ||
| + | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
| + | [[File:Le_Conte's_Thrasher.jpg|100x100px|green hellebore]] | ||
| + | [[File:Toxostoma_leconteiAQBIP12CA.jpg|100x100px|green hellebore]] | ||
| + | </div> | ||
<!-- | <!-- | ||
| Line 20: | Line 24: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Disclaimer: I created the map for this article. I am adding the images to the DYK nom. Both are appropriately licensed and sourced. The article expansion is new enough (started 1/28/15) and of sufficient length. The hook is interesting and clearly cited to a reliable, verifiable, and appropriate source. All paragraphs in the article are cited. I did not go through with a fine tooth comb for close paraphrasing, but did not see anything of immediate concern. Given my potential conflict of interest, will request another editor review for oversight. [[User:Gaff|Gaff]] ([[User talk:Gaff|talk]]) 23:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |
| + | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 23:49, 28 January 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Le Conte's thrasher
- ... that the Le Conte's thrasher can run at a pace that is faster than a trotting horse...?
Created/expanded by LeftAire (talk). Self nominated at 20:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC).
Disclaimer: I created the map for this article. I am adding the images to the DYK nom. Both are appropriately licensed and sourced. The article expansion is new enough (started 1/28/15) and of sufficient length. The hook is interesting and clearly cited to a reliable, verifiable, and appropriate source. All paragraphs in the article are cited. I did not go through with a fine tooth comb for close paraphrasing, but did not see anything of immediate concern. Given my potential conflict of interest, will request another editor review for oversight. Gaff (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

