Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Le Conte's thrasher"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>LeftAire
imported>Gaff
(looks good)
Line 6: Line 6:
 
====Le Conte's thrasher====
 
====Le Conte's thrasher====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Le Conte's thrasher|Le Conte's thrasher}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Le Conte's thrasher|Le Conte's thrasher}}
 +
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 +
[[File:Le_Conte's_Thrasher.jpg|100x100px|green hellebore]]
 +
[[File:Toxostoma_leconteiAQBIP12CA.jpg|100x100px|green hellebore]]
 +
</div>
 
<!--   
 
<!--   
  
Line 20: Line 24:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Disclaimer: I created the map for this article.  I am adding the images to the DYK nom.  Both are appropriately licensed and sourced.  The article expansion is new enough (started 1/28/15) and of sufficient length.  The hook is interesting and clearly cited to a reliable, verifiable, and appropriate source.  All paragraphs in the article are cited.  I did not go through with a fine tooth comb for close paraphrasing, but did not see anything of immediate concern.  Given my potential conflict of interest, will request another editor review for oversight.  [[User:Gaff|Gaff]] ([[User talk:Gaff|talk]]) 23:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
 
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:49, 28 January 2015

Le Conte's thrasher

green hellebore green hellebore

Created/expanded by LeftAire (talk). Self nominated at 20:13, 28 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg Disclaimer: I created the map for this article. I am adding the images to the DYK nom. Both are appropriately licensed and sourced. The article expansion is new enough (started 1/28/15) and of sufficient length. The hook is interesting and clearly cited to a reliable, verifiable, and appropriate source. All paragraphs in the article are cited. I did not go through with a fine tooth comb for close paraphrasing, but did not see anything of immediate concern. Given my potential conflict of interest, will request another editor review for oversight. Gaff (talk) 23:49, 28 January 2015 (UTC)