Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lees Creek (Lackawanna River)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jakec
(rp)
imported>Jakec
(cmt)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
::::::{{ping|Jakec}} Essentially, you reviewed [[Cretica Chronica]], rejecting it for being too short, but you haven't addressed any of the five points of [[WP:WIADYK]] for the [[Kythira Strait]] nomination. The way to rectify this is to provide a full review ''along with'' your ALT suggestion. Sorry for any hassle, but I'm not comfortable stating that a full QPQ has been performed for the latter article at this time, because it really hasn't yet. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 16:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 
::::::{{ping|Jakec}} Essentially, you reviewed [[Cretica Chronica]], rejecting it for being too short, but you haven't addressed any of the five points of [[WP:WIADYK]] for the [[Kythira Strait]] nomination. The way to rectify this is to provide a full review ''along with'' your ALT suggestion. Sorry for any hassle, but I'm not comfortable stating that a full QPQ has been performed for the latter article at this time, because it really hasn't yet. <span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;">[[User:Northamerica1000|North America]]<sup>[[User talk:Northamerica1000|<font size="-2">1000</font>]]</sup></span> 16:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:::::::{{ping|Northamerica1000}} If that's how you feel, I don't mind putting this nomination on hold until {{u|Dr. Blofeld}} responds to my comments on the 1630 Crete earthquake nomination and the review over there gets completed. Or I could seek a 3rd opinion from [[WT:DYK]]. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 13:43, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 
:::::::{{ping|Northamerica1000}} If that's how you feel, I don't mind putting this nomination on hold until {{u|Dr. Blofeld}} responds to my comments on the 1630 Crete earthquake nomination and the review over there gets completed. Or I could seek a 3rd opinion from [[WT:DYK]]. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 13:43, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 
+
:::::[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  The QPQ review is now finished. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 16:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 16:58, 17 July 2015

Lees Creek (Lackawanna River)

  • ... that part of the channel Lees Creek cuts through coal waste, cinders, and railroad ballast?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 17:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Starting with approved matters: new and long enough. Per the revision history, the page was actually created on 29 May 2015‎, but the nomination is still within seven days of the publishing to main namespace (the entry is listed on the DYK nominations page under Articles created/expanded on June 1). All non-lead paragraphs have inline citations, Checks for copyvio reveals no problems, content of the hook is backed by an inline citation to a reliable source in the article (here, p. 323).
A problem is that the QPQ review at Template:Did you know nominations/1630 Crete earthquake is being used for this nomination and for the Template:Did you know nominations/Eddy Creek (Lackawanna River) (which was approved by another user) and Template:Did you know nominations/Powderly Creek nominations. Per WP:WIADYK, #5, "For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination." The 1630 Crete earthquake review cannot be used for multiple nominations. North America1000 04:47, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Whoa, hold it. The 1630 Crete Earthquake is a triple nomination! The nominator added two more bolded links and I reviewed them. Even if that weren't the case, you could just, you know, have me do another QPQ instead of rejecting it. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 09:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Sorry for the potential confusion. However, at the 1630 Crete Earthquake nomination, you did not really provide a review for Kythira Strait. Rather, you proposed a standalone hook. North America1000 10:22, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
Template:Ping I did in fact do a full review of both articles, but am waiting for the nominator to respond to my concerns. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 14:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Template:Ping Essentially, you reviewed Cretica Chronica, rejecting it for being too short, but you haven't addressed any of the five points of WP:WIADYK for the Kythira Strait nomination. The way to rectify this is to provide a full review along with your ALT suggestion. Sorry for any hassle, but I'm not comfortable stating that a full QPQ has been performed for the latter article at this time, because it really hasn't yet. North America1000 16:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
Template:Ping If that's how you feel, I don't mind putting this nomination on hold until Template:U responds to my comments on the 1630 Crete earthquake nomination and the review over there gets completed. Or I could seek a 3rd opinion from WT:DYK. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 13:43, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
Symbol redirect vote 4.svg The QPQ review is now finished. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 16:58, 17 July 2015 (UTC)