Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Librotraficante"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Passed for DYK)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from February 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=February 2019  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Librotraficante====
 
====Librotraficante====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Librotraficante|Librotraficante}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Librotraficante|Librotraficante}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that '''[[Librotraficante]]''' smuggled books into Arizona?
 
* ... that '''[[Librotraficante]]''' smuggled books into Arizona?
  
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Chamber pop|Chamber pop]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Chamber pop|Chamber pop]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Librotraficante|Nikkimaria|subpage=Librotraficante}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Could a better hook be proposed here? It has potential but the wording seems too abrupt, and smuggling by itself is not really interesting for DYK standards if there's no context. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 12:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Could a better hook be proposed here? It has potential but the wording seems too abrupt, and smuggling by itself is not really interesting for DYK standards if there's no context. [[User:Narutolovehinata5|Narutolovehinata5]] <sup>[[User talk:Narutolovehinata5|t]][[Special:Contributions/Narutolovehinata5|c]][[WP:CSD|csd]][[Special:Newpages|new]]</sup> 12:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 20:
  
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Have added ALT1 above. Calling for new reviewer. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 14:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Have added ALT1 above. Calling for new reviewer. [[User:Nikkimaria|Nikkimaria]] ([[User talk:Nikkimaria|talk]]) 14:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is new enough and long enough. I find the original hook quite intriguing and am approving it. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This article is new enough and long enough. I find the original hook quite intriguing and am approving it. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 06:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 19:59, 2 April 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:59, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Librotraficante

Created by Nikkimaria (talk). Self-nominated at 15:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Could a better hook be proposed here? It has potential but the wording seems too abrupt, and smuggling by itself is not really interesting for DYK standards if there's no context. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 12:22, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
  • that Librotraficante led a caravan from Houston to smuggle books into underground libraries in Arizona? Nikkimaria (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
That doesn't sound very clear to a typical reader, to be honest. If you want, I could suggest a rephrased hook here. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Sure. Nikkimaria (talk) 13:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
I'm having difficulty right now thinking of an exact wording, but one suggestion I could give would be to focus on how it was formed as a result of that Arizona decision. Or you could build up from the smuggling thing, but also mention how the movement also created "underground libraries". Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:39, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Have added ALT1 above. Calling for new reviewer. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:17, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg This article is new enough and long enough. I find the original hook quite intriguing and am approving it. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. A QPQ has been done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:40, 18 March 2019 (UTC)