Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lilpop, Rau i Loewenstein"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Peripitus
(all ok)
imported>Peripitus
(forgot one bit)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]], age and size check out. References confirmed where possible and AGF on the rest. Hook (both) check through other searches. Length is good. Images properly licenced and the display image, though of low contrast, is PD. QPQ looks ok, just someone else put the final tick. Neutral, interesting company name, looks ok for the DYK section using the first tag by preference. - [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 08:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]], age and size check out. References confirmed where possible and AGF on the rest. Hook (both) check through other searches. Length is good. Images properly licenced and the display image, though of low contrast, is PD. QPQ looks ok, just someone else put the final tick. Neutral, interesting company name, looks ok for the DYK section using the first tag by preference. Can't find any evidence of too close paraphrasing. - [[User:Peripitus |Peripitus]] [[User talk:Peripitus|(Talk)]] 08:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 08:43, 9 May 2014

Lilpop, Rau i Loewenstein

A 1860 Lilpop & Rau advertisement; Loewenstein joined the company a decade later.

Created by Halibutt (talk). Self nominated at 08:29, 14 April 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg, age and size check out. References confirmed where possible and AGF on the rest. Hook (both) check through other searches. Length is good. Images properly licenced and the display image, though of low contrast, is PD. QPQ looks ok, just someone else put the final tick. Neutral, interesting company name, looks ok for the DYK section using the first tag by preference. Can't find any evidence of too close paraphrasing. - Peripitus (Talk) 08:42, 9 May 2014 (UTC)