Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lin Yining"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kingoflettuce
imported>Yoninah
(restoring tick)
Line 25: Line 25:
 
::::*{{Ping|Bcschneider53}} {{Ping|Yoninah}} The QPQ ''is'' there, there's no need to be boring and explicitly list down the five criteria all the time. I do not believe it is dictated by policy either -- more like a personal preference. The ''lack'' of issues raised means I am okay with all aspects of the article. However, since you insist, I shall be on my way... Happy now? [[User:Kingoflettuce|Kingoflettuce]] ([[User talk:Kingoflettuce|talk]]) 03:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 
::::*{{Ping|Bcschneider53}} {{Ping|Yoninah}} The QPQ ''is'' there, there's no need to be boring and explicitly list down the five criteria all the time. I do not believe it is dictated by policy either -- more like a personal preference. The ''lack'' of issues raised means I am okay with all aspects of the article. However, since you insist, I shall be on my way... Happy now? [[User:Kingoflettuce|Kingoflettuce]] ([[User talk:Kingoflettuce|talk]]) 03:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 
For the convenience of others my original QPQ was " [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Pretty neat article, new and long enuf (well certainly past 1500 chars despite DYKcheck being buggy for me), so well done! (Would be good if the actual article had some images and more categories but that's besides the point). AGF on the plot and all." which in fact hits all the vital spots. "not complete" lol [[User:Kingoflettuce|Kingoflettuce]] ([[User talk:Kingoflettuce|talk]]) 04:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 
For the convenience of others my original QPQ was " [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Pretty neat article, new and long enuf (well certainly past 1500 chars despite DYKcheck being buggy for me), so well done! (Would be good if the actual article had some images and more categories but that's besides the point). AGF on the plot and all." which in fact hits all the vital spots. "not complete" lol [[User:Kingoflettuce|Kingoflettuce]] ([[User talk:Kingoflettuce|talk]]) 04:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 +
::*{{ping|Kingoflettuce}} Please see this policy: [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria]] – '''5. Review requirement (QPQ)''': ''For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination (unrelated to you)‍—‌this is called quid pro quo or QPQ. The review must address all five criteria listed here.''
 +
::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Thank you for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/The_Rickshank_Rickdemption&diff=788564784&oldid=788510160 adding] the [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] and [[WP:Close paraphrasing|close paraphrasing]] checks to your original review. Restoring tick per Bcschneider53's review. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 12:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:04, 2 July 2017

Lin Yining

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 08:19, 9 June 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol voting keep.svg New enough, long enough, hook cited here and in the article. Prefer the first of the two. QPQ done. Hook accepted in good faith as the source is in print (the Google Books preview omits the applicable page). Good to go. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:36, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Hi, I came by to promote this, but notice that the QPQ was not complete. Please see there. Yoninah (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Template:Ping The QPQ is there, there's no need to be boring and explicitly list down the five criteria all the time. I do not believe it is dictated by policy either -- more like a personal preference. The lack of issues raised means I am okay with all aspects of the article. However, since you insist, I shall be on my way... Happy now? Kingoflettuce (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

For the convenience of others my original QPQ was " Symbol voting keep.svg Pretty neat article, new and long enuf (well certainly past 1500 chars despite DYKcheck being buggy for me), so well done! (Would be good if the actual article had some images and more categories but that's besides the point). AGF on the plot and all." which in fact hits all the vital spots. "not complete" lol Kingoflettuce (talk) 04:02, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

  • Template:Ping Please see this policy: WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria5. Review requirement (QPQ): For every nomination you make you must review one other nomination (unrelated to you)‍—‌this is called quid pro quo or QPQ. The review must address all five criteria listed here.
  • Symbol voting keep.svg Thank you for adding the neutrality and close paraphrasing checks to your original review. Restoring tick per Bcschneider53's review. Yoninah (talk) 12:03, 2 July 2017 (UTC)