Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lindy Creek"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Jakec
(rp)
imported>Yoninah
(ALT1 good to go)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that near its headwaters, the gradient of '''[[Lindy Creek]]''' is on the order of {{convert|400|ft/mi}}, but in its lower reaches, the gradient is only on the order of {{convert|40|ft/mi}}?
+
* <s>... that near its headwaters, the gradient of '''[[Lindy Creek]]''' is on the order of {{convert|400|ft/mi}}, but in its lower reaches, the gradient is only on the order of {{convert|40|ft/mi}}?</s>
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Indium lung]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Indium lung]]
Line 23: Line 23:
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed of nomination as made; merger is not happening. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 13:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  Full review needed of nomination as made; merger is not happening. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 13:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. The hook, though, is too statistical. Maybe you could write something about the ice pond, or about the flooding in 1936? QPQ done. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. The hook, though, is too statistical. Maybe you could write something about the ice pond, or about the flooding in 1936? QPQ done. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
::*{{ping|Yoninah}} I had a look and I don't think there's anything else terribly fascinating that can be pulled from the rest of the article. I suppose we could cut the statistics and just say '''ALT1: ''' ... that near its headwaters, the gradient of '''[[Lindy Creek]]''' about ten times higher than it is in its lower reaches? Come to think of it, that's more succinct and more likely to draw in readers. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 19:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
+
::*{{ping|Yoninah}} I had a look and I don't think there's anything else terribly fascinating that can be pulled from the rest of the article. I suppose we could cut the statistics and just say:
 +
::*'''ALT1: ''' ... that near its headwaters, the gradient of '''[[Lindy Creek]]''' is about ten times higher than it is in its lower reaches? -- Come to think of it, that's more succinct and more likely to draw in readers. --'''[[User:Jakec|Jakob]] ([[user talk:Jakec|talk]]) ''' <small><small>aka Jakec</small></small> 19:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 +
:::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] I agree. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. ALT1 good to go. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 19:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 19:31, 18 May 2015

Lindy Creek

  • ... that near its headwaters, the gradient of Lindy Creek is on the order of 400 feet per mile (76 m/km), but in its lower reaches, the gradient is only on the order of 40 feet per mile (7.6 m/km)?

Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 19:57, 8 April 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Full review needed of nomination as made; merger is not happening. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:48, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. The hook, though, is too statistical. Maybe you could write something about the ice pond, or about the flooding in 1936? QPQ done. Yoninah (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I had a look and I don't think there's anything else terribly fascinating that can be pulled from the rest of the article. I suppose we could cut the statistics and just say:
  • ALT1: ... that near its headwaters, the gradient of Lindy Creek is about ten times higher than it is in its lower reaches? -- Come to think of it, that's more succinct and more likely to draw in readers. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 19:24, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg I agree. ALT1 hook ref verified and cited inline. ALT1 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 19:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)