Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lolani"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Miyagawa (Replied) |
imported>Fuebaey (ping notice) |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Okay: new enough, long enough. No copyvio or close paraphrasing that I could detect. Neutral. Image is properly licensed. ALTs 0 & 2 are supported by sources; the material relating to ALT1 was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolani&diff=634992127&oldid=634737301 removed], so I have struck that hook. QPQ has been done, although the review is not yet completed. Article is well sourced EXCEPT for the following statements: "{{tq|and its costs were eventually covered with money raised through a successful Kickstarter campaign held from October 7 to November 6, 2013.}}" <small>(Neither of the sources support the October 7-November 6 statement)</small> and "{{tq|and was simultaneously released on the official Star Trek Continues YouTube and Vimeo channels.}}" which is unsourced. Once those are sourced or removed, this will be good to go. [[User:G S Palmer|G S Palmer]] <small>([[User talk:G S Palmer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/G S Palmer|contribs]])</small> 19:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Okay: new enough, long enough. No copyvio or close paraphrasing that I could detect. Neutral. Image is properly licensed. ALTs 0 & 2 are supported by sources; the material relating to ALT1 was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lolani&diff=634992127&oldid=634737301 removed], so I have struck that hook. QPQ has been done, although the review is not yet completed. Article is well sourced EXCEPT for the following statements: "{{tq|and its costs were eventually covered with money raised through a successful Kickstarter campaign held from October 7 to November 6, 2013.}}" <small>(Neither of the sources support the October 7-November 6 statement)</small> and "{{tq|and was simultaneously released on the official Star Trek Continues YouTube and Vimeo channels.}}" which is unsourced. Once those are sourced or removed, this will be good to go. [[User:G S Palmer|G S Palmer]] <small>([[User talk:G S Palmer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/G S Palmer|contribs]])</small> 19:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
::*I've removed the uncited information. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 13:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC) | ::*I've removed the uncited information. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 13:28, 10 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | ::::{{re|G S Palmer}} Would you like to finish this up? [[User:Fuebaey|Fuebaey]] ([[User talk:Fuebaey|talk]]) 18:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:04, 13 January 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lolani
- ... that Lou Ferrigno (pictured) was reminded of his role in The Incredible Hulk when he appeared in the Star Trek Continues episode "Lolani"?
- ALT1:
... that Rod Roddenberry said his father, Gene Roddenberry, would have been "extremely proud" of the Star Trek Continues episode "Lolani"? - Comment: The image is to go with the first hook.
- ALT1:
Created by LowLevel73 (talk). Nominated by Miyagawa (talk) at 09:53, 21 November 2014 (UTC).
- Adding Alt2:... that Lou Ferrigno (pictured) was reminded of his role in The Incredible Hulk when he appeared as a green Orion trader in the Star Trek Continues episode "Lolani"? Miyagawa (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Miyagawa, as this was nominated after the new rules went into effect, a QPQ will be required, as they are now for all nominations, whether self-noms or noms of articles by others. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- No problem, I didn't know about the change - I'll review one and add it here. Miyagawa (talk) 13:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, reviewed Galadriel Stineman. Miyagawa (talk) 19:05, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Full review needed now that QPQ has been supplied. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:42, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Reviewing... G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 16:33, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
Okay: new enough, long enough. No copyvio or close paraphrasing that I could detect. Neutral. Image is properly licensed. ALTs 0 & 2 are supported by sources; the material relating to ALT1 was removed, so I have struck that hook. QPQ has been done, although the review is not yet completed. Article is well sourced EXCEPT for the following statements: "Template:Tq" (Neither of the sources support the October 7-November 6 statement) and "Template:Tq" which is unsourced. Once those are sourced or removed, this will be good to go. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 19:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
-
- Template:Re Would you like to finish this up? Fuebaey (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
