Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/London Fields Brewery"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (re) |
imported>Peter I. Vardy (OK) |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
::# If there are no problems with the DYK, you should be passing it while assuming good faith, rather than trying to avoid assuming good faith, surely? | ::# If there are no problems with the DYK, you should be passing it while assuming good faith, rather than trying to avoid assuming good faith, surely? | ||
::other than those small niggles, thanks for checking the article - it means a lot, as it will the first DYK for one of us! [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Message me]]) 21:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ::other than those small niggles, thanks for checking the article - it means a lot, as it will the first DYK for one of us! [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Message me]]) 21:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | :::* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Thanks. --[[User:Peter I. Vardy|Peter I. Vardy]] ([[User talk:Peter I. Vardy|talk]]) 22:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:42, 14 December 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
London Fields Brewery
- ... that London Fields Brewery was the first commercial brewery to open in Hackney since the 19th century?
- Reviewed: Trent from Punchy
Created by Panyd (talk), Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk), Battleofalma (talk). Nominated by Panyd (talk) at 17:33, 10 December 2014 (UTC).
- Alt1 hook: ... that London Fields Brewery brewed Love Not War while barricaded in the brewery during the London riots? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 23:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Date, length OK. Article well referenced, neutral, and I found no copyvio. The original hook is confirmed by the online Ref 6, but the ref at the end of the relevant sentence is Ref 7, which is offline. IMO it would be better if Ref 6 were also added to the end of this sentence to avoid AGF. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 20:56, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
- I have made the change you've suggested, but:
- I don't agree with you that online references are better than paper ones, especially in this case, where the offline reference (a newspaper) is more reliable than the online one (an advert).
- If there are no problems with the DYK, you should be passing it while assuming good faith, rather than trying to avoid assuming good faith, surely?
- other than those small niggles, thanks for checking the article - it means a lot, as it will the first DYK for one of us! Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (Message me) 21:39, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 22:41, 14 December 2014 (UTC)