Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Long Tan Cross"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Date and length fine. Sources reliable. Offline sources AGF. No copy vios. Photo licensed. Hook correctly formatted. Offline citation for hook facts AGF. Just one small issue: In your article, the date for erection of the replica is 1986, but in ref #6 it's 1989. [[User:ACP2011|Anne]] ([[User talk:ACP2011|talk]]) 21:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | ::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Date and length fine. Sources reliable. Offline sources AGF. No copy vios. Photo licensed. Hook correctly formatted. Offline citation for hook facts AGF. Just one small issue: In your article, the date for erection of the replica is 1986, but in ref #6 it's 1989. [[User:ACP2011|Anne]] ([[User talk:ACP2011|talk]]) 21:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
:::*Yes, different sources give different dates; I'd gone with the recently-published official history as it's the most reliable source. However, I've added both options as the two references are reliable. Thanks a lot for your review. Regards, [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 09:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | :::*Yes, different sources give different dates; I'd gone with the recently-published official history as it's the most reliable source. However, I've added both options as the two references are reliable. Thanks a lot for your review. Regards, [[User:Nick-D|Nick-D]] ([[User talk:Nick-D|talk]]) 09:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]Checked size and date, sources good, date issue cleared up with conflicting sources mentioned and cited. Good to go. - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub | + | ::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]]Checked size and date, sources good, date issue cleared up with conflicting sources mentioned and cited. Good to go. - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] <sub>[[User talk:The Bushranger|<span style="color:maroon;">One ping only</span>]]</sub> 17:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC) |
{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 20:00, 30 January 2019
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:08, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Long Tan Cross
- ... that a replica of the Long Tan Cross (original pictured) is one of only two memorials to foreign military forces permitted in Vietnam?
- Reviewed: Allie Clark
Created/expanded by Nick-D (talk). Self nom at 12:13, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
-
- 16px Date and length fine. Sources reliable. Offline sources AGF. No copy vios. Photo licensed. Hook correctly formatted. Offline citation for hook facts AGF. Just one small issue: In your article, the date for erection of the replica is 1986, but in ref #6 it's 1989. Anne (talk) 21:00, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, different sources give different dates; I'd gone with the recently-published official history as it's the most reliable source. However, I've added both options as the two references are reliable. Thanks a lot for your review. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 09:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
- 16pxChecked size and date, sources good, date issue cleared up with conflicting sources mentioned and cited. Good to go. - The Bushranger One ping only 17:54, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
