Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Lotus throne"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (new reviewer needed) |
imported>Kingsif |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
::*Okay, well maybe someone else will approve the hook as it is. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 19:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC) | ::*Okay, well maybe someone else will approve the hook as it is. --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 19:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
:::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed to see whether the hook is fine as is, or a new or newly revised hook is needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | :::*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed to see whether the hook is fine as is, or a new or newly revised hook is needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 19:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Hook looks good to me, is in the book. It could perhaps use a simpler word than 'exhorted', but I don't see this as a big issue, and it is one that is often dealt with in rephrasing by the promoters in my experience. [[User:Kingsif|Kingsif]] ([[User talk:Kingsif|talk]]) 17:25, 21 December 2019 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 17:25, 21 December 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lotus throne
Guanyin from Japan
Guanyin from Japan
- ... that around 200 CE the Indian monk Nagarjuna exhorted a king to make "Images of Buddha with fine proportions/ Well designed and sitting on lotuses"? Walser, Joseph (2005). Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture. Columbia University Press. pp. 86–87. ISBN 9780231506236.
Created by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 14:22, 30 November 2019 (UTC).
- 16px At the time of its nomination, it was new enough and long enough. Passes the earwig test. The hook needs some work. --evrik (talk) 18:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Looks fine to me. Johnbod (talk) 18:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, well maybe someone else will approve the hook as it is. --evrik (talk) 19:09, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- 16px New reviewer needed to see whether the hook is fine as is, or a new or newly revised hook is needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:48, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
