Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Louis Braille"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>ColonelHenry
(approving DYK hook)
imported>ColonelHenry
Line 24: Line 24:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]], recently-promoted GA, the article is of sufficient length, looks well sourced (did a spotcheck, as a GA is must be, and assume offline sources on good faith since several are recognizably well-known scholarship) and does not have any indication of copyvio or paraphrasing problems. Hook is of appropriate length and format, neutral, interesting and sufficiently cited. Good to go!--[[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]] ([[User talk:ColonelHenry|talk]]) 18:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] '''Approved''' - recently-promoted GA, the article is of sufficient length, looks well sourced (did a spotcheck, as a GA is must be, and assume offline sources on good faith since several are recognizably well-known scholarship) and does not have any indication of copyvio or paraphrasing problems. Hook is of appropriate length and format, neutral, interesting and sufficiently cited. Good to go!--[[User:ColonelHenry|ColonelHenry]] ([[User talk:ColonelHenry|talk]]) 18:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:39, 22 February 2014

Louis Braille

Comparative Lettering Hauy-Barbier-Braille

  • Reviewed: Kanako Momota
  • Comment: Not a self-nom, but I'm listing one of my own reviews as a QPQ

Improved to Good Article status by SteveStrummer (talk). Nominated by Maile66 (talk) at 14:45, 22 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Approved - recently-promoted GA, the article is of sufficient length, looks well sourced (did a spotcheck, as a GA is must be, and assume offline sources on good faith since several are recognizably well-known scholarship) and does not have any indication of copyvio or paraphrasing problems. Hook is of appropriate length and format, neutral, interesting and sufficiently cited. Good to go!--ColonelHenry (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)