Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Ludwig II (sculpture)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Redfiona99 (Reviewing) |
imported>KCVelaga (to prep 1) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2018]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by Regards, [[User:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga|Krishna Chaitanya Velaga]] ([[User_talk:Krishna Chaitanya Velaga|talk]] • [[Special:EmailUser/Krishna_Chaitanya_Velaga|mail]]) 02:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Ludwig II (sculpture)==== | ====Ludwig II (sculpture)==== | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Ludwig II Ney Detail.jpg|caption=''Ludwig II'' by Elisabet Ney|width=120x133}} | {{main page image|image=Ludwig II Ney Detail.jpg|caption=''Ludwig II'' by Elisabet Ney|width=120x133}} | ||
− | </div | + | </div> |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that some historians believe [[Elisabet Ney]]'s '''[[Ludwig II (sculpture)|full-length statue]]''' ''(pictured)'' of "Mad King Ludwig" of [[Bavaria]] was created as part of a [[Prussia]]n scheme to [[Unification of Germany|unify Germany]]? <small>Source: "Later historians ... have either speculated or bluntly stated ... that Elisabet Ney ... was also useful as a political agent. ... Ney's job, [they] reason, was somehow to ingratiate herself with Ludwig and influence him to submit Bavaria ... to Hohenzollern domination." ({{Cite book|title=The Art of the Woman: The Life and Work of Elisabet Ney|first=Emily Fourmy|last=Cutrer|year=2016|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aBQXDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT64|pages=64–65}})</small> | * ... that some historians believe [[Elisabet Ney]]'s '''[[Ludwig II (sculpture)|full-length statue]]''' ''(pictured)'' of "Mad King Ludwig" of [[Bavaria]] was created as part of a [[Prussia]]n scheme to [[Unification of Germany|unify Germany]]? <small>Source: "Later historians ... have either speculated or bluntly stated ... that Elisabet Ney ... was also useful as a political agent. ... Ney's job, [they] reason, was somehow to ingratiate herself with Ludwig and influence him to submit Bavaria ... to Hohenzollern domination." ({{Cite book|title=The Art of the Woman: The Life and Work of Elisabet Ney|first=Emily Fourmy|last=Cutrer|year=2016|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aBQXDAAAQBAJ&pg=PT64|pages=64–65}})</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Freundliche Vision|Freundliche Vision]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Freundliche Vision|Freundliche Vision]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Bryanrutherford0|Bryanrutherford0]] ([[User talk:Bryanrutherford0|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Bryanrutherford0|Bryanrutherford0]] ([[User talk:Bryanrutherford0|talk]]). Self-nominated at 15:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article was created within 7 days of nomination. Article hasn't been ITN. Article is long enough (3459 characters according to DYK checker). Article does not contain copyvio, or close paraphrasing of the sources I have been able to read (only 1 reference available to check). Hook is short enough, and is suitably hooky (I chose to QPQ review this because the hook intrigued me). The two images in the article are CC BY-SA 4.0 licensed, and the hook image appears in the article. Hook image has rollover text. Picture is relevant, as it is of the statue that the article is about. Image is clear but it is bigger than 100 x 100. I checked if the image was still clear at 100 x 100 and it was. [[User:Redfiona99|Red Fiona]] ([[User talk:Redfiona99|talk]]) 23:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Article was created within 7 days of nomination. Article hasn't been ITN. Article is long enough (3459 characters according to DYK checker). Article does not contain copyvio, or close paraphrasing of the sources I have been able to read (only 1 reference available to check). Hook is short enough, and is suitably hooky (I chose to QPQ review this because the hook intrigued me). The two images in the article are CC BY-SA 4.0 licensed, and the hook image appears in the article. Hook image has rollover text. Picture is relevant, as it is of the statue that the article is about. Image is clear but it is bigger than 100 x 100. I checked if the image was still clear at 100 x 100 and it was. [[User:Redfiona99|Red Fiona]] ([[User talk:Redfiona99|talk]]) 23:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC) | ||
− | {{-}} | + | {{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 02:56, 23 January 2018
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Ludwig II (sculpture)
- ... that some historians believe Elisabet Ney's full-length statue (pictured) of "Mad King Ludwig" of Bavaria was created as part of a Prussian scheme to unify Germany? Source: "Later historians ... have either speculated or bluntly stated ... that Elisabet Ney ... was also useful as a political agent. ... Ney's job, [they] reason, was somehow to ingratiate herself with Ludwig and influence him to submit Bavaria ... to Hohenzollern domination." (Cutrer, Emily Fourmy (2016). The Art of the Woman: The Life and Work of Elisabet Ney. pp. 64–65.)
- Reviewed: Freundliche Vision
Created by Bryanrutherford0 (talk). Self-nominated at 15:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC).
Article was created within 7 days of nomination. Article hasn't been ITN. Article is long enough (3459 characters according to DYK checker). Article does not contain copyvio, or close paraphrasing of the sources I have been able to read (only 1 reference available to check). Hook is short enough, and is suitably hooky (I chose to QPQ review this because the hook intrigued me). The two images in the article are CC BY-SA 4.0 licensed, and the hook image appears in the article. Hook image has rollover text. Picture is relevant, as it is of the statue that the article is about. Image is clear but it is bigger than 100 x 100. I checked if the image was still clear at 100 x 100 and it was. Red Fiona (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)