Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Luke Hancock"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from April 2013]]<div style="background-color:#F3F9FF; margin:2em 0 0 0; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #AAAAAA"> | ||
| − | :{{DYKF|11}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Luke Hancock]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Luke Hancock|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Luke Hancock|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</ | + | :{{DYKF|11}} <i><b><span style="color:red">The following is an archived discussion</span></b> of <b>[[Luke Hancock]]</b>'s <b>[[Template:NewDYKnomination|DYK nomination]]</b>. <b>Please do not modify this page</b>. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived <b>nomination</b>"s [[Template talk:Did you know nominations/Luke Hancock|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], the nominated <b>article</b>'s [[Talk:Luke Hancock|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]], or the {{DYK blue}} [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know|(<b>talk</b>) <b>page</b>]]. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. <span style="color:red"><b>No further edits should be made to this page</b>.</span> <span style="float:right">See the <b>[[WP:TPG|talk page guidelines]]</b> for [[WP:ARCHIVE|(<b>more</b>)]] information.</span></i>{{clear}} |
The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC).<br /> | The result was: <b>promoted</b> by [[User:Panyd|Panyd]]<sup>[[User talk:Panyd|The muffin is not subtle]]</sup> 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC).<br /> | ||
Latest revision as of 09:56, 12 October 2018
The following is an archived discussion of Luke Hancock's DYK nomination. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page; such as this archived nomination"s (talk) page, the nominated article's (talk) page, or the Did you know
(talk) page. Unless there is consensus to re-open the archived discussion here. No further edits should be made to this page. See the talk page guidelines for (more) information.
The result was: promoted by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 22:03, 17 April 2013 (UTC).
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Luke Hancock
- ... that Luke Hancock was named the Most Outstanding Player of the 2013 NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament?
- ALT1: ... that Luke Hancock is the first reserve player to be named Most Outstanding Player of the NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Tournament?
- Comment: If this were April Fool's, I could try to think of an alt hook that uses the fact that he wasn't really recruited when he attended a high school called "Hidden Valley"...
- Reviewed:
IOUTemplate:Did you know nominations/Nitesh Narayan Rane
Created by Muboshgu (talk), PM800 (talk), Oren0 (talk), and Dale Arnett (talk). Nominated by Muboshgu (talk) at 14:38, 9 April 2013 (UTC).
- Hooks: Both Look good (short enough, cited, and interesting). I do prefer ALT1 over the other one.
- Article: Long enough, new enough and is well referenced.
Once QPQ is completed, this will be good to go. Patriarca12 (talk) 01:43, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review. I appreciate that you didn't give it the checkmark until I give it the QPQ; sometimes I put "IOU" there and get a checkmark anyway from a reviewer who isn't careful enough. I'll go look for something to review now. – Muboshgu (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! QPQ now complete and this is now good to go. Patriarca12 (talk) 10:53, 10 April 2013 (UTC)