Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/MLS Cup 2005"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SounderBruce
(reply)
imported>SounderBruce
(QPQ)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
* ... that '''[[MLS Cup 2005]]''' featured the same teams and ended with the same scoreline as [[MLS Cup 2002]]? <small>Source: ''Worcester Telegram & Gazette'' (via AP)</small>
 
* ... that '''[[MLS Cup 2005]]''' featured the same teams and ended with the same scoreline as [[MLS Cup 2002]]? <small>Source: ''Worcester Telegram & Gazette'' (via AP)</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the winning goal in '''[[MLS Cup 2005]]''' was scored by [[Guillermo Ramírez]], who had missed all 62 of his shots from open play that season? <small>Source: [https://web.archive.org/web/20060708142142/http://www.mlsnet.com/MLS/news/mls_events_news.jsp?ymd=20051113&content_id=48284&vkey=mlscup2005&fext=.jsp MLSnet]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the winning goal in '''[[MLS Cup 2005]]''' was scored by [[Guillermo Ramírez]], who had missed all 62 of his shots from open play that season? <small>Source: [https://web.archive.org/web/20060708142142/http://www.mlsnet.com/MLS/news/mls_events_news.jsp?ymd=20051113&content_id=48284&vkey=mlscup2005&fext=.jsp MLSnet]</small>
:* ''Reviewed'': TBD
+
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Nick Russell (actor)|Nick Russell (actor)]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] ([[User talk:SounderBruce|talk]]). Self-nominated at 03:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:SounderBruce|SounderBruce]] ([[User talk:SounderBruce|talk]]). Self-nominated at 03:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC).</small>
 
<!--
 
<!--
Line 21: Line 21:
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is 5x expanded in the proper time frame. Well sourced, with inline citations throughout the text. Both hook facts are supported by inline citations in the text, in the "Post-match" section, and are interesting enough to go with. Written neutrally, no apparent copy vio problems. Two issues that prevent me from approving right now: (1) the "Summary of results" section doesn't have any source, and (2) QPQ is needed. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 04:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article is 5x expanded in the proper time frame. Well sourced, with inline citations throughout the text. Both hook facts are supported by inline citations in the text, in the "Post-match" section, and are interesting enough to go with. Written neutrally, no apparent copy vio problems. Two issues that prevent me from approving right now: (1) the "Summary of results" section doesn't have any source, and (2) QPQ is needed. &ndash;&nbsp;[[User:Muboshgu|Muboshgu]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Muboshgu#top|talk]]) 04:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|Muboshgu}} The summary tables are supported by the whole "Road to the final" section, so repeating the citations would be unnecessary here, not to mention a formatting nightmare. Similar tables have passed GAN and FAC without similar scrutiny. '''[[User:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#5d9731; color:white; padding:2px;">Sounder</span>]][[User talk:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#1047AB; color:white; padding:2px;">Bruce</span>]]''' 04:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|Muboshgu}} The summary tables are supported by the whole "Road to the final" section, so repeating the citations would be unnecessary here, not to mention a formatting nightmare. Similar tables have passed GAN and FAC without similar scrutiny. '''[[User:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#5d9731; color:white; padding:2px;">Sounder</span>]][[User talk:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#1047AB; color:white; padding:2px;">Bruce</span>]]''' 04:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
 +
::*{{ping|Muboshgu}} QPQ has been completed and added above. '''[[User:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#5d9731; color:white; padding:2px;">Sounder</span>]][[User talk:SounderBruce|<span style="background:#1047AB; color:white; padding:2px;">Bruce</span>]]''' 03:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 03:20, 24 January 2019

MLS Cup 2005

  • ... that MLS Cup 2005 featured the same teams and ended with the same scoreline as MLS Cup 2002? Source: Worcester Telegram & Gazette (via AP)

5x expanded by SounderBruce (talk). Self-nominated at 03:45, 17 January 2019 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article is 5x expanded in the proper time frame. Well sourced, with inline citations throughout the text. Both hook facts are supported by inline citations in the text, in the "Post-match" section, and are interesting enough to go with. Written neutrally, no apparent copy vio problems. Two issues that prevent me from approving right now: (1) the "Summary of results" section doesn't have any source, and (2) QPQ is needed. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:31, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping The summary tables are supported by the whole "Road to the final" section, so repeating the citations would be unnecessary here, not to mention a formatting nightmare. Similar tables have passed GAN and FAC without similar scrutiny. SounderBruce 04:41, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping QPQ has been completed and added above. SounderBruce 03:20, 24 January 2019 (UTC)