Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/MMPL Kanpur"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>TSRL
imported>Mackensen
(reviewed)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the MMPL Kanpur is a rare example of an aircraft designed and built by a national air force for its own use?
+
* ... that the '''[[MMPL Kanpur]]''' is a rare example of an aircraft designed and built by a national air force for its own use?
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The article is new enough (moved to mainspace on July 3) and long enough (1885 characters). The offline references to Jane's are accepted in good faith. The hook is interesting but unfortunately not backed by an inline citation. I admit that I haven't heard of many aircraft built by their own air force but I think we need a reference for this claim. Please remember to link the article in the hook next time. Please complete a [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] review as well and we'll be good to go. Best, [[User:Mackensen|Mackensen]] [[User_talk:Mackensen|(talk)]] 00:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:49, 6 July 2014

MMPL Kanpur

  • ... that the MMPL Kanpur is a rare example of an aircraft designed and built by a national air force for its own use?

Created by TSRL (talk). Self nominated at 19:50, 3 July 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg The article is new enough (moved to mainspace on July 3) and long enough (1885 characters). The offline references to Jane's are accepted in good faith. The hook is interesting but unfortunately not backed by an inline citation. I admit that I haven't heard of many aircraft built by their own air force but I think we need a reference for this claim. Please remember to link the article in the hook next time. Please complete a QPQ review as well and we'll be good to go. Best, Mackensen (talk) 00:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)