Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Macleay's dorcopsis"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yellow Dingo (review) |
imported>Adam Cuerden |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from June 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em; class=texhtml">'''[[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]]''' <sup>([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]])</sup></span> 14:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Macleay's dorcopsis==== | ====Macleay's dorcopsis==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Macleay's dorcopsis|Macleay's dorcopsis}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Macleay's dorcopsis|Macleay's dorcopsis}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that although the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]] at one time considered '''[[Macleay's dorcopsis]]''' to be a [[vulnerable species]], it is now rated as "[[Least-concern species|least concern]]"? | * ... that although the [[International Union for Conservation of Nature|IUCN]] at one time considered '''[[Macleay's dorcopsis]]''' to be a [[vulnerable species]], it is now rated as "[[Least-concern species|least concern]]"? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bungy Watson|Bungy Watson]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bungy Watson|Bungy Watson]] | ||
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | :* | + | :* |
*[[File:Symbol support vote.svg|16px]] '''No issues found.''' | *[[File:Symbol support vote.svg|16px]] '''No issues found.''' | ||
Line 32: | Line 24: | ||
Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This bot is experimental; please [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DYKReviewBot|report any issues]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 23:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC) | Automatically reviewed by [[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]]. This bot is experimental; please [[Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DYKReviewBot|report any issues]]. This is '''not''' a substitute for a human review. --[[User:DYKReviewBot|DYKReviewBot]] ([[User talk:Intelligentsium|report bugs]]) 23:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC) | ||
− | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Adding onto the bots review: Hook is interesting, cited and source supports it. The article is neutral, long enough, new enough and well sourced. No copyvios and QPQ is done correctly. Well done. - [[User:Yellow Dingo|Yellow Dingo]] ([[User talk:Yellow Dingo|talk]]) 13:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC) | + | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Adding onto the bots review: Hook is interesting, cited and source supports it. The article is neutral, long enough, new enough and well sourced. No copyvios and QPQ is done correctly. Well done. - [[User:Yellow Dingo|Yellow Dingo]] ([[User talk:Yellow Dingo|talk]]) 13:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− |
Latest revision as of 14:56, 5 July 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Macleay's dorcopsis
- ... that although the IUCN at one time considered Macleay's dorcopsis to be a vulnerable species, it is now rated as "least concern"?
- Reviewed: Bungy Watson
5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 09:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC).
No issues found.
- ✓ This article has been expanded from 291 chars to 1824 chars since 03:39, 21 December 2015 (UTC), a 6.27-fold expansion
- ✓ This article meets the DYK criteria at 1824 characters
- ✓ All paragraphs in this article have at least one citation
- ✓ This article has no outstanding maintenance tags
- ✓ The probability of copyright violation is 1.0%. (confirm)
- Note to reviewers: There is low confidence in this automated metric, please manually verify that there is no copyright infringement or close paraphrasing. Note that this number may be inflated due to cited quotes and titles which do not constitute a copyright violation.
- ✓ The hook ALT0 is an appropriate length at 134 characters
- ✓ This is Cwmhiraeth's 1287th nomination. A QPQ review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bungy Watson was performed for this nomination.
Automatically reviewed by DYKReviewBot. This bot is experimental; please report any issues. This is not a substitute for a human review. --DYKReviewBot (report bugs) 23:37, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Adding onto the bots review: Hook is interesting, cited and source supports it. The article is neutral, long enough, new enough and well sourced. No copyvios and QPQ is done correctly. Well done. - Yellow Dingo (talk) 13:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)