Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Macombs Dam Bridge"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius
(cmt)
imported>John M Wolfson
(Agreed)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
**{{u|John M Wolfson}}, thanks for the review. I think other hooks can technically be made, but they wouldn't be as interesting. For instance:
 
**{{u|John M Wolfson}}, thanks for the review. I think other hooks can technically be made, but they wouldn't be as interesting. For instance:
 
***'''ALT2''' ...that the '''[[Macombs Dam Bridge]]''', called "a beautiful piece of engineering work", was featured in an [[Edward Hopper]] painting? <small>"The Harlem River: The Beginning of a Developing Movement in which the City May Take Pride"; LPC p. 8</small> [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 02:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 
***'''ALT2''' ...that the '''[[Macombs Dam Bridge]]''', called "a beautiful piece of engineering work", was featured in an [[Edward Hopper]] painting? <small>"The Harlem River: The Beginning of a Developing Movement in which the City May Take Pride"; LPC p. 8</small> [[User:Epicgenius|epicgenius]] ([[User talk:Epicgenius|talk]]) 02:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 
+
****Agreed. &ndash; [[User:John M Wolfson|John M Wolfson]] ([[User talk:John M Wolfson|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/John M Wolfson|contribs]]) 02:23, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:23, 11 January 2020

Macombs Dam Bridge

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 20:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC).

  • I will be reviewing this. At first glance this already seems more than long enough ☑Y and passes the 5x expansion mark. ☑Y I'll look at the rest later, and evaluate hooks when you have them. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 21:54, 7 January 2020 (UTC)
Template:U, thanks for talking up the review. Can you look at the first two hooks? I have just gotten out of a surgery and will not be able to look for other hooks for a couple days. epicgenius (talk) 16:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Will do, hope you feel better! – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 16:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg The article seems neutral enough and Earwig's tool does not return any copyvios. ☑Y ALT0 is directly stated in the article and verified by the source given. ☑Y (I'm not so sure that ALT1 is expressly stated in the body of the article; ALT0 is better in my opinion, anyway.) QPQ appears adequate.☑Y Overall, I see no problems with ALT0, and can approve them if you don't feel like making more. – John M Wolfson (talkcontribs) 06:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
    • Template:U, thanks for the review. I think other hooks can technically be made, but they wouldn't be as interesting. For instance: