Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Macrosiphum rosae"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
 
imported>Umimmak
(review -- just throw in some more footnotes)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*   -->
+
:* {{ping|Cwmhiraeth}}
 
+
:**  Both are long enough, new/newly-expanded enough, neutral in tone, have no unreferenced paragraphs, no apparent copyright violations. The images on ''M. rosae'', including the one for the hook, are appropriately licensed. Image also appears fine at this scale. Both hooks are short enough and formatted correctly, and interesting. QPQ (x2) is done.
 +
:** [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Information in hooks is stated clearly in the articles, but I think information in hooks should have citations directly after the relevant sentences, not just at the end of the paragraph. You can easily fix this by just adding in some extra footnotes.
 +
:** That's the only issue I'm seeing now, otherwise it looks like you will be good to go. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 08:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 08:23, 18 February 2018

Macrosiphum rosae, Metopolophium dirhodum

Rose aphid with dark siphunculi
Rose aphid with dark siphunculi

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 20:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC).

  • Template:Ping
    • Both are long enough, new/newly-expanded enough, neutral in tone, have no unreferenced paragraphs, no apparent copyright violations. The images on M. rosae, including the one for the hook, are appropriately licensed. Image also appears fine at this scale. Both hooks are short enough and formatted correctly, and interesting. QPQ (x2) is done.
    • Symbol question.svg Information in hooks is stated clearly in the articles, but I think information in hooks should have citations directly after the relevant sentences, not just at the end of the paragraph. You can easily fix this by just adding in some extra footnotes.
    • That's the only issue I'm seeing now, otherwise it looks like you will be good to go. Umimmak (talk) 08:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)