Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Macrosiphum rosae"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Response)
imported>Umimmak
(approve, but with additional questions)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
:** That's the only issue I'm seeing now, otherwise it looks like you will be good to go. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 08:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 
:** That's the only issue I'm seeing now, otherwise it looks like you will be good to go. [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 08:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 
::::{{ping|Umimmak}} Thanks. I have added a couple more footnotes, is that better? [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 
::::{{ping|Umimmak}} Thanks. I have added a couple more footnotes, is that better? [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 10:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
 +
::::: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] {{ping|Cwmhiraeth}} Yes, that looks better, thanks. Maybe you can be explicit about the sentences saying they overwintering on roses, but the sentences with citations pretty much say that? Just to be safe as down the reviewing line some editors can be stricter than others. P.S. do you want to wikilink  [[overwintering]] in the article/hook? Something to consider (I'm leaning towards yes in article, no in hook but that's your call). [[User:Umimmak|Umimmak]] ([[User talk:Umimmak|talk]]) 10:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:26, 18 February 2018

Macrosiphum rosae, Metopolophium dirhodum

Rose aphid with dark siphunculi
Rose aphid with dark siphunculi

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 20:34, 16 February 2018 (UTC).

  • Template:Ping
    • Both are long enough, new/newly-expanded enough, neutral in tone, have no unreferenced paragraphs, no apparent copyright violations. The images on M. rosae, including the one for the hook, are appropriately licensed. Image also appears fine at this scale. Both hooks are short enough and formatted correctly, and interesting. QPQ (x2) is done.
    • Symbol question.svg Information in hooks is stated clearly in the articles, but I think information in hooks should have citations directly after the relevant sentences, not just at the end of the paragraph. You can easily fix this by just adding in some extra footnotes.
    • That's the only issue I'm seeing now, otherwise it looks like you will be good to go. Umimmak (talk) 08:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Template:Ping Thanks. I have added a couple more footnotes, is that better? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Template:Ping Yes, that looks better, thanks. Maybe you can be explicit about the sentences saying they overwintering on roses, but the sentences with citations pretty much say that? Just to be safe as down the reviewing line some editors can be stricter than others. P.S. do you want to wikilink overwintering in the article/hook? Something to consider (I'm leaning towards yes in article, no in hook but that's your call). Umimmak (talk) 10:26, 18 February 2018 (UTC)