Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Magnesium monohydride"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Prioryman (Good to go) |
imported>George Ho (cmt) |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The subject matter is waaaaay over my head, so I'm necessarily having to AGF with much of this; but sourcing seems impeccable, the article is comprehensive and well-written, it's clearly long enough and new enough, and the hook fact is both interesting and properly referenced. This article's good to go. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 22:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The subject matter is waaaaay over my head, so I'm necessarily having to AGF with much of this; but sourcing seems impeccable, the article is comprehensive and well-written, it's clearly long enough and new enough, and the hook fact is both interesting and properly referenced. This article's good to go. [[User:Prioryman|Prioryman]] ([[User talk:Prioryman|talk]]) 22:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::* I moved the nomination to the January 4 section. Although expanded started on the 3rd, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Magnesium_monohydride&oldid=640915087 the Jan 4 revision] is 757 prose bytes. Current revision is 8k. I moved it to this date based on the seven-day limit. Fortunately, the nomination was on time. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 22:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 22:46, 15 January 2015
DYK toolbox |
---|
Magnesium monohydride
- ... that magnesium monohydride is a molecule known only as a gas but found on the sun and other stars?
- Reviewed: Vidya Balan filmography
5x expanded by Graeme Bartlett (talk). Self nominated at 06:50, 11 January 2015 (UTC).
The subject matter is waaaaay over my head, so I'm necessarily having to AGF with much of this; but sourcing seems impeccable, the article is comprehensive and well-written, it's clearly long enough and new enough, and the hook fact is both interesting and properly referenced. This article's good to go. Prioryman (talk) 22:14, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
- I moved the nomination to the January 4 section. Although expanded started on the 3rd, the Jan 4 revision is 757 prose bytes. Current revision is 8k. I moved it to this date based on the seven-day limit. Fortunately, the nomination was on time. George Ho (talk) 22:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)