Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Majestic, Leeds"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Dumelow
(start)
imported>Dumelow
(more)
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Rcsprinter123|Rcsprinter123]], just started to take a look at this one.  I'll continue looking at it but for now I note the final two sentences in the article aren't referenced? - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Hi [[User:Rcsprinter123|Rcsprinter123]], just started to take a look at this one.  I'll continue looking at it but for now I note the final two sentences in the article aren't referenced? - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 +
:::5x expansion from 14 September confirmed; barring the above citations seem to be in order, though preferably there should be page numbers for Cook and the Heritage Statement.  Is the heritage statement not available online, perhaps as part of the planning application? I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing; hooks are interesting; I have some issues with verifying the hooks, for ALT1 I can't see that the 2014 Yorkshire Evening Post article verifies that the refurbishment was complete at the time of the fire (indeed much of the first paragraph of the "Fire and redevelopment" section does not appear in the source and needs to be checked); for ALT0 the article states that Channel 4 have yet to move in? - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 06:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 06:58, 17 September 2020

Majestic, Leeds

  • Reviewed: Review to come.

5x expanded by Rcsprinter123 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:39, 16 September 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Hi Rcsprinter123, just started to take a look at this one. I'll continue looking at it but for now I note the final two sentences in the article aren't referenced? - Dumelow (talk) 12:24, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
5x expansion from 14 September confirmed; barring the above citations seem to be in order, though preferably there should be page numbers for Cook and the Heritage Statement. Is the heritage statement not available online, perhaps as part of the planning application? I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing; hooks are interesting; I have some issues with verifying the hooks, for ALT1 I can't see that the 2014 Yorkshire Evening Post article verifies that the refurbishment was complete at the time of the fire (indeed much of the first paragraph of the "Fire and redevelopment" section does not appear in the source and needs to be checked); for ALT0 the article states that Channel 4 have yet to move in? - Dumelow (talk) 06:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)