Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Schenck Woolman"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Binksternet
(QPQ needed.)
imported>Krelnik
(completed QPQ)
Line 13: Line 13:
 
-->
 
-->
 
* ... that early [[vocational education]] advocate '''[[Mary Schenck Woolman]]''' ''(pictured)'' got her first teaching position as the result of her "harsh" review of a sewing manual?  <small>Source: [https://www-anb-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/view/10.1093/anb/9780198606697.001.0001/anb-9780198606697-e-0900962 American National Biography] article says: "...asked Woolman to critique a book on sewing instruction. Her review was harsh, and both Baker and the president of Teachers College were impressed with her analysis; therefore, they requested that she write her own views on the subject. The sewing manual she wrote....was a success, and in 1892 Teachers College appointed Woolman an assistant in the Department of Domestic Science." </small>
 
* ... that early [[vocational education]] advocate '''[[Mary Schenck Woolman]]''' ''(pictured)'' got her first teaching position as the result of her "harsh" review of a sewing manual?  <small>Source: [https://www-anb-org.wikipedialibrary.idm.oclc.org/view/10.1093/anb/9780198606697.001.0001/anb-9780198606697-e-0900962 American National Biography] article says: "...asked Woolman to critique a book on sewing instruction. Her review was harsh, and both Baker and the president of Teachers College were impressed with her analysis; therefore, they requested that she write her own views on the subject. The sewing manual she wrote....was a success, and in 1892 Teachers College appointed Woolman an assistant in the Department of Domestic Science." </small>
:* ''Reviewed'': review pending
+
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Perspectiva corporum regularium|Perspectiva corporum regularium]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Krelnik|Krelnik]] ([[User talk:Krelnik|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Krelnik|Krelnik]] ([[User talk:Krelnik|talk]]). Self-nominated at 21:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<!--
 
<!--
Line 20: Line 20:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article length, neutrality and referencing are good. Close paraphrasing is not a problem, nor is copyvio. The hook is fine, and the photo is public domain. All that remains is QPQ. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 00:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article length, neutrality and referencing are good. Close paraphrasing is not a problem, nor is copyvio. The hook is fine, and the photo is public domain. All that remains is QPQ. [[User:Binksternet|Binksternet]] ([[User talk:Binksternet|talk]]) 00:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 +
::{{reply to|Binksternet}} Thanks for the review, I have completed my QPQ review. --[[User:Krelnik|Krelnik]] ([[User talk:Krelnik|talk]]) 20:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:29, 3 September 2020

Mary Schenck Woolman

Mary Schenck Woolman
Mary Schenck Woolman
  • ... that early vocational education advocate Mary Schenck Woolman (pictured) got her first teaching position as the result of her "harsh" review of a sewing manual? Source: American National Biography article says: "...asked Woolman to critique a book on sewing instruction. Her review was harsh, and both Baker and the president of Teachers College were impressed with her analysis; therefore, they requested that she write her own views on the subject. The sewing manual she wrote....was a success, and in 1892 Teachers College appointed Woolman an assistant in the Department of Domestic Science."

Created by Krelnik (talk). Self-nominated at 21:21, 30 August 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article length, neutrality and referencing are good. Close paraphrasing is not a problem, nor is copyvio. The hook is fine, and the photo is public domain. All that remains is QPQ. Binksternet (talk) 00:39, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Template:Reply to Thanks for the review, I have completed my QPQ review. --Krelnik (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)