Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Mass in B minor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (to prep 4) |
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
[[File:Bwv232-credo.jpg|100x100px|Title page of Credo]] | [[File:Bwv232-credo.jpg|100x100px|Title page of Credo]] | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
| − | + | *... that [[Johann Sebastian Bach]] reworked music from more than three decades earlier for the central piece ''Crucifixus'' in the symmetrical structure of his '''[[Mass in B minor structure|Mass in B minor]]''' ''(autograph pictured)''? | |
| − | : | + | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mir Samir|Mir Samir]] |
| − | : | + | :* ''Comment'': When the article was new I [[Template:Did you know nominations/Mass in B minor structure|nominated]] it, now I expanded it more than five time. |
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]). Self nominated at 21:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)</small>. | <small>5x expanded by [[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]). Self nominated at 21:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC)</small>. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:12, 7 March 2018
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 21:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mass in B minor structure
- ... that Johann Sebastian Bach reworked music from more than three decades earlier for the central piece Crucifixus in the symmetrical structure of his Mass in B minor (autograph pictured)?
5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nominated at 21:43, 4 May 2013 (UTC).
Article is long enough; 5x expansion occurred within 5 days before nomination. Appears well sourced, and uses public domain imagery, so no copyright issues appear present. Hook is interesting enough and supported within the article's references. Good to go for inclusion in DYK! Good job! Nmillerche (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you, - it will still grow a bit as we rehearse, keep watching, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:02, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
