Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Mass surveillance in North Korea"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maile66 (cmt) |
imported>Daniel Case (Dull hook) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
:::*Given recent issues with close paraphrasing and copyvio from this author—see [[WT:DYK#ACLU v. Clapper]]—this nomination should not be approved without a thorough check in these areas. Potential reviewers please take note. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | :::*Given recent issues with close paraphrasing and copyvio from this author—see [[WT:DYK#ACLU v. Clapper]]—this nomination should not be approved without a thorough check in these areas. Potential reviewers please take note. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 06:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
:::::In addition to being "retired", the editor was blocked indefinitely on Feb 13, so he couldn't currently resolve any issues on this nomination if he wanted to. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 01:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC) | :::::In addition to being "retired", the editor was blocked indefinitely on Feb 13, so he couldn't currently resolve any issues on this nomination if he wanted to. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 01:05, 16 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Dull hook. What else would a surveillance network do? Or be? [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 07:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 07:11, 19 February 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Mass surveillance in North Korea
- ... that North Korea's surveillance network includes of informants who monitor their fellow citizens for indications of subversive behavior?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Elstree Project
- Comment: Please hold for potential use on Feb 11, alt text much appreciated
Nominated by HectorMoffet (talk) at 21:05, 2 February 2014 (UTC).
- Comment: This won't appear on DYK on 11 February, consensus on WT:DYK was to not take part in any of the surveillance proposals as it would be a NPOV violation. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:18, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- The nominator now has "Semi-retired" on his user page and talk pages. The review used as QPQ was only three words: "Appropriate link, interesting". So it does not qualify as QPQ, but the nominator did not have enough DYKs to need a QPQ anyway. I reviewed The Elsrtee Project. — Maile (talk) 17:51, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
- Given recent issues with close paraphrasing and copyvio from this author—see WT:DYK#ACLU v. Clapper—this nomination should not be approved without a thorough check in these areas. Potential reviewers please take note. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Dull hook. What else would a surveillance network do? Or be? Daniel Case (talk) 07:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)