Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Maureen Chiquet"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(asking for details on review)
imported>Cambalachero
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 01:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 01:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi Cambalachero. Could you please give some details of what you checked on this?  Per [[T:TDYK#How to review a nomination|DYK review instructions]] {{tq|please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.}}  Thank you for doing this. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 
::::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Hi Cambalachero. Could you please give some details of what you checked on this?  Per [[T:TDYK#How to review a nomination|DYK review instructions]] {{tq|please begin with one of the 5 review symbols that appear at the top of the edit screen, and then indicate all aspects of the article that you have reviewed.}}  Thank you for doing this. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
Article
 +
New – within the past five days, the article has
 +
* been created (sandbox → mainspace is eligible) {{ok}}
 +
* Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters {{ok}}
 +
Within policy – meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular:
 +
* is neutral {{ok}}
 +
* cites sources with inline citations {{ok}}
 +
* is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism {{ok}}
 +
 +
Hook
 +
* Format – fewer than 200 characters {{ok}} (shorter is better) and meets the formatting guidelines
 +
Content
 +
* interesting {{ok}}
 +
* hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article {{ok}}
 +
* neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people {{ok}}
 +
 +
There it is [[User:Cambalachero|Cambalachero]] ([[User talk:Cambalachero|talk]]) 17:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
 +
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 17:16, 11 January 2014

Maureen Chiquet

  • Comment: Not a self nomination

Created by Aardvark112 (talk). Nominated by Matty.007 (talk) at 14:36, 22 December 2013 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg You need to clarify who called her a Francophile. The article should have as well more meaningful categories, besides just "X year births" and "Living people" Cambalachero (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
  • Attempted fix of both. Thanks, Matty.007 08:47, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go Cambalachero (talk) 01:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg Hi Cambalachero. Could you please give some details of what you checked on this? Per DYK review instructions Template:Tq Thank you for doing this. — Maile (talk) 21:43, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Article New – within the past five days, the article has

  • been created (sandbox → mainspace is eligible) Template:Ok
  • Long enough – the prose portion is at least 1,500 characters Template:Ok

Within policy – meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular:

Hook

  • Format – fewer than 200 characters Template:Ok (shorter is better) and meets the formatting guidelines

Content

  • interesting Template:Ok
  • hook fact is accurate and cited with an inline citation in the article Template:Ok
  • neutral and does not focus unduly on negative aspects of living people Template:Ok

There it is Cambalachero (talk) 17:16, 11 January 2014 (UTC)