Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Medea (Reimann)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SJ Morg
(start review)
imported>Gerda Arendt
(spread ref)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]  Counting just the prose portion, 5x expansion is confirmed, and began only 2 days before nomination.  Article is long enough, with approximately 1,845 characters of prose.  No policy issues with neutrality or phrasing.  Image is freely licensed and suitable for DYK. Hook is short enough, and facts in it are supported by inline citations (of good sources) in the article.  Hook won't be very exciting to a broad audience, but I feel it's sufficiently interesting, and accept nominator's comment about the  semi-rarity of operas being premiered at that opera house.
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]]  Counting just the prose portion, 5x expansion is confirmed, and began only 2 days before nomination.  Article is long enough, with approximately 1,845 characters of prose.  No policy issues with neutrality or phrasing.  Image is freely licensed and suitable for DYK. Hook is short enough, and facts in it are supported by inline citations (of good sources) in the article.  Hook won't be very exciting to a broad audience, but I feel it's sufficiently interesting, and accept nominator's comment about the  semi-rarity of operas being premiered at that opera house.
 
::Two issues: One has to read two longish sentences in the main body in order to cover both hook facts, even though the sources do support both facts, so I suggest adding (repeating) another inline citation at the end of the first sentence under History or, maybe better, adding a sentence to the lead that just covers the main DYK hook items and then place inline citation(s) at the end of that sentence.  However, I'm now wondering whether the DYK rule I'm thinking of has been discontinued, a rule that said, for the hook fact, the relevant sentence in the article needs to have an inline citation at the end of the sentence, not just the paragraph.  Is that rule gone now?  (It has been about a year since I last did a DYK review.)  Also, note there is currently a citation-format error that needs fixing, a reference named "IRCAM" that has not been defined anywhere. [[User:SJ Morg|SJ Morg]] ([[User talk:SJ Morg|talk]]) 06:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 
::Two issues: One has to read two longish sentences in the main body in order to cover both hook facts, even though the sources do support both facts, so I suggest adding (repeating) another inline citation at the end of the first sentence under History or, maybe better, adding a sentence to the lead that just covers the main DYK hook items and then place inline citation(s) at the end of that sentence.  However, I'm now wondering whether the DYK rule I'm thinking of has been discontinued, a rule that said, for the hook fact, the relevant sentence in the article needs to have an inline citation at the end of the sentence, not just the paragraph.  Is that rule gone now?  (It has been about a year since I last did a DYK review.)  Also, note there is currently a citation-format error that needs fixing, a reference named "IRCAM" that has not been defined anywhere. [[User:SJ Morg|SJ Morg]] ([[User talk:SJ Morg|talk]]) 06:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
 +
 +
::: Thank you for a thorough review! I spread the Büning reference generously over half-sentences and the premiere (IRCAM seems to have been copied from another work, sorry about the that.) In the lead, I would only reference facts that have no ref in the body, or a quotations. You will have to say something about the image. I proposed the same for a different opera, but would prefer it for this one, as it's closer in date to the composition, and this is the more substantial - and more recent - opera, - a rare thing ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 07:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 07:46, 13 August 2017

Medea (Reimann)

Aribert Reimann in 2011
Aribert Reimann in 2011
  • Reviewed: Florence E. Bamberger
  • Comment: not many new operas premiered at that house, - the commission was quite an honour

5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 21:40, 24 July 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Counting just the prose portion, 5x expansion is confirmed, and began only 2 days before nomination. Article is long enough, with approximately 1,845 characters of prose. No policy issues with neutrality or phrasing. Image is freely licensed and suitable for DYK. Hook is short enough, and facts in it are supported by inline citations (of good sources) in the article. Hook won't be very exciting to a broad audience, but I feel it's sufficiently interesting, and accept nominator's comment about the semi-rarity of operas being premiered at that opera house.
Two issues: One has to read two longish sentences in the main body in order to cover both hook facts, even though the sources do support both facts, so I suggest adding (repeating) another inline citation at the end of the first sentence under History or, maybe better, adding a sentence to the lead that just covers the main DYK hook items and then place inline citation(s) at the end of that sentence. However, I'm now wondering whether the DYK rule I'm thinking of has been discontinued, a rule that said, for the hook fact, the relevant sentence in the article needs to have an inline citation at the end of the sentence, not just the paragraph. Is that rule gone now? (It has been about a year since I last did a DYK review.) Also, note there is currently a citation-format error that needs fixing, a reference named "IRCAM" that has not been defined anywhere. SJ Morg (talk) 06:01, 13 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for a thorough review! I spread the Büning reference generously over half-sentences and the premiere (IRCAM seems to have been copied from another work, sorry about the that.) In the lead, I would only reference facts that have no ref in the body, or a quotations. You will have to say something about the image. I proposed the same for a different opera, but would prefer it for this one, as it's closer in date to the composition, and this is the more substantial - and more recent - opera, - a rare thing ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:46, 13 August 2017 (UTC)