Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Melaleuca wilsonii"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Casliber
(add)
imported>Mandarax
m (Properly terminate the font – this was obnoxiously making the nominations below it green)
Line 28: Line 28:
 
*The article is long enough, adequately expanded within the timeframe and is stable. QPQ is done. The hook is short enough and the fact is cited to a reliable offline source. It's not the most attention grabbing of hooks, though. Can anything better be found? The image has an appropriate license & works fine at the size. There are a few things in the article that worry me. The lead has several statements that aren't referenced in the text, including the point of view that it is "one of the most attractive of the genus" and the fact that it's "widely cultivated", which doesn't appear fully supported by sources. The first paragraph of the description needs references. Duplication detector pulled up several instances of stretches of repetition from sources, and on closer inspection some sentences appear to be pulled together by nearly duplicating more than one source. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 22:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 
*The article is long enough, adequately expanded within the timeframe and is stable. QPQ is done. The hook is short enough and the fact is cited to a reliable offline source. It's not the most attention grabbing of hooks, though. Can anything better be found? The image has an appropriate license & works fine at the size. There are a few things in the article that worry me. The lead has several statements that aren't referenced in the text, including the point of view that it is "one of the most attractive of the genus" and the fact that it's "widely cultivated", which doesn't appear fully supported by sources. The first paragraph of the description needs references. Duplication detector pulled up several instances of stretches of repetition from sources, and on closer inspection some sentences appear to be pulled together by nearly duplicating more than one source. [[User:Espresso Addict|Espresso Addict]] <small>([[User talk:Espresso Addict|talk]])</small> 22:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 
::<font color="green">can be tricky with only a limited number of synonyms - I will look at this in a few hours when I have hte books next to me. cheers, </font>[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)  
 
::<font color="green">can be tricky with only a limited number of synonyms - I will look at this in a few hours when I have hte books next to me. cheers, </font>[[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 23:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)  
::<font color="green">update - changed to "often" cultivated - added a ref. removed the "attractive" (and included that ref another way) [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
+
::<font color="green">update - changed to "often" cultivated - added a ref. removed the "attractive" (and included that ref another way)</font> [[User:Casliber|Cas Liber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 01:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:37, 2 April 2015

Melaleuca wilsonii

Melaleuca wilsonii, Maranoa Gardens

5x expanded by Gderrin (talk), Casliber (talk), Melburnian (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 13:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC).

  • Moved to twelfth of March to reflect start of expansion. George Ho (talk) 20:47, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
Sorry 'bout that. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:34, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
  • The article is long enough, adequately expanded within the timeframe and is stable. QPQ is done. The hook is short enough and the fact is cited to a reliable offline source. It's not the most attention grabbing of hooks, though. Can anything better be found? The image has an appropriate license & works fine at the size. There are a few things in the article that worry me. The lead has several statements that aren't referenced in the text, including the point of view that it is "one of the most attractive of the genus" and the fact that it's "widely cultivated", which doesn't appear fully supported by sources. The first paragraph of the description needs references. Duplication detector pulled up several instances of stretches of repetition from sources, and on closer inspection some sentences appear to be pulled together by nearly duplicating more than one source. Espresso Addict (talk) 22:40, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
can be tricky with only a limited number of synonyms - I will look at this in a few hours when I have hte books next to me. cheers, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 23:22, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
update - changed to "often" cultivated - added a ref. removed the "attractive" (and included that ref another way) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:39, 2 April 2015 (UTC)